ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO494

Incidence of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation after Kidney Transplantation with Low-Dose Rituximab Administration

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1702 Transplantation: Clinical and Translational

Authors

  • Masutani, Kosuke, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Omoto, Kazuya, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Okumi, Masayoshi, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Okabe, Yasuhiro, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Shimizu, Tomokazu, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Tsuruya, Kazuhiko, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Kitazono, Takanari, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Fukuoka, Japan
  • Ishida, Hideki, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
  • Tanabe, Kazunari, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Group or Team Name

  • Japan Academic Consortium of Kidney Transplantation (JACK) Investigators
Background

In patients with hematological malignancy who are intended to receive rituximab, hepatitis B virus (HBV) serology screening and viral reactivation monitoring are recommended. However, the effect of single-dose rituximab on HBV reactivation in kidney transplant (KT) patients with previous HBV infection is still unclear.

Methods

In this retrospective cohort study of 1,294 KT patients, we identified 76 who were negative for preoperative hepatitis B surface antigen and HBV DNA, and positive for hepatitis B core antibody. A rituximab dose of 200 mg/body was administered to 48 patients; 46 of whom did not receive prophylaxis (rituximab + group). Twenty-eight patients received neither rituximab nor prophylaxis (rituximab − group). We monitored HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction every 1–3 months, and HBV reactivation was defined as detectable HBV DNA.

Results

HBV reactivation was found in one patient in the rituximab + group (2.2%) and one in the rituximab − group (3.6%) at 6 weeks and 5.5 years post-KT, respectively, but it was spontaneously cleared. Both patients were positive for hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) preoperatively. HBV reactivation was not found in six patients lacking anti-HBs preoperatively.

Conclusion

Low-dose rituximab administration in KT patients without prophylaxis is associated with a low incidence of HBV reactivation. However, the sequential monitoring is necessary for many years to detect viral reactivation and prevent de novo hepatitis.