ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005


The Latest on Twitter

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO120

Glyco-iELISA: A Novel Assay to Detect STEC-HUS

Session Information

Category: Acute Kidney Injury

  • 003 AKI: Clinical and Translational


  • Wijnsma, Kioa L., Radboud medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Veissi, Susan, Radboud medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Ugalde, Juan E, Universidad Nacional de San Martin, San Martin, Argentina
  • Comerci, Diego J., Universidad Nacional de San Martin, San Martin, Argentina
  • Van De Kar, Nicole, Radboud medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
  • Van den heuvel, Bert, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands

Differentiation between hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) caused by Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC-HUS) or a dysregulated complement system (atypical HUS; aHUS) is a clinical conundrum. As aHUS, whose treatment requires the highly expensive orphan drug eculizumab, is a diagnoses per exclusionem, a method to reliably detect STEC infection is warranted.
Since the current golden standard (fecal diagnostics; FD) for the detection of STEC infection has important drawbacks, serological detection of antibodies against STEC-associated lipopolysaccharides by ELISA (LPS-ELISA) has proven its value. However, LPS-ELISA have important limitations. Therefore, we have developed and evaluated the diagnostic value of ELISA employing recombinant glycoproteins of STEC-associated LPS (glyco-iELISA).


In this retrospective study, patients (n=61) who presented with clinical STEC-HUS in the Radboudumc, Nijmegen, Netherlands, between 1990-2014 were included. Clinical, diagnostic and follow up data were gathered. Both LPS-ELISA and glyco-iELISA were employed to detect IgM antibodies against the most common serotype of STEC (O157).


FD, LPS-ELISA, and glyco-iELISA identified STEC infection in respectively, 53%, 64%, and 75% of patients. Glyco-iELISA provided evidence of STEC infection in 7 (11%) and 20 (33%) additional patients when compared to LPS-ELISA or FD, respectively. Combining the glyco-iELISA with FD identified STEC infection in 89% of patients. The glyco-iELISA appeared highly reproducible and reliable, as the intra- and inter-assay variability was low.


The glyco-iELISA is a highly sensitive and accurate serological method to detect STEC in HUS patients. Combined with FD, the glyco-iELISA improves STEC detection by 36%. Thus, the glyco-iELISA may drastically limit the unnecessary use of eculizumab in STEC-HUS.