ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO0457

Economic Impact of Online High-Volume Hemodiafiltration in a Brazilian Private Health System: A Real-World Cost Analysis from 2018-2023

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Author

  • Silveira Junior, Sergio Antonio Dias Da, Prevent Senior Private Operadora de Saude Ltda, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Background

Despite growing evidence of the clinical advantages of online high-volume hemodiafiltration (HDF), limited data exist on its economic implications in real-world settings, particularly within middle-income countries. This study aimed to assess the financial impact of incorporating HDF in Brazil's private health sector.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cost analysis of 2,167 patients with ESRD treated between 2018 and 2023 by a large Brazilian private health plan. Patients were classified into three groups: (1) conventional HD, (2) exclusive HDF online, and (3) HD→HDF converters. We analyzed five cost domains: emergency care, hospital admissions, outpatient services, high-complexity procedures, and dialysis treatments. Difference-in-differences models and Callaway & Sant’Anna estimators were applied to estimate causal effects. Annual per-patient expenditures and cost per clinical event were compared across groups.

Results

HDF patients had higher dialysis-related costs (+12.8%) but showed significant cost reductions in other domains: emergency care (–18.4%, p<0.01), outpatient services (–16.7%, p<0.01), and high-complexity procedures (–14.2%, p<0.05). Hospital admission costs showed no significant difference. Total mean annual cost per patient was lower in the HDF group compared to HD (R$37,100 vs. R$41,700; p<0.05), indicating favorable cost-effectiveness.

Conclusion

Despite higher procedural expenses, online HDF led to a net reduction in total healthcare spending by preventing high-cost clinical events. These findings support the economic sustainability of HDF implementation within private health systems.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)