ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO1223

Impact of Tenofovir Alafenamide (TAF)-Containing Regimens vs. Regimens Without TAF on Kidney Outcomes in HIV Treatment: Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2302 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Liu, Haopeng, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Teali, Ishfaq Rashid, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Rashid, Muhammed, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Kalati, Java, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Willis, Connor W., University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Rogers, Rachel, Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California, United States
  • Navadeh, Soodi, Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California, United States
  • Weinberg, Amy R., Gilead Sciences Inc, Foster City, California, United States
  • Chaiyakunapruk, Nathorn, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Background

Tenofovir disoproxil has been linked to renal adverse events. TAF, a prodrug of tenofovir (TFV), shows improved renal outcomes. Further analyses are needed to compare renal outcomes between TAF and other antiretroviral therapies (ART).

Methods

A comprehensive search in multiple databases was done up to 02/14/2025. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing TAF vs non-TAF ART for HIV-1 treatment and reported changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or serum creatinine (SCr). Outcomes were pooled by mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) in random-effects models.

Results

We included 22 RCTs for eGFR (11,160 patients) and 18 for SCr (9,785 patients). Compared to non-TAF ART, TAF was associated with increased eGFR (MD: 1.40 mL/min; 95% CI: 0.72 to 2.07; I2 = 94.9%, Figure 1A) and decreased SCr (MD: -0.01 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.01; I2 = 92.1%). In subgroup analyses compared with non-TFV ART, TAF showed similar trends (eGFR: MD: 1.82 mL/min; 95% CI: -0.40 to 4.04; I2 = 86%, Figure 1B; SCr: MD: -0.01 mg/dL; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.01; I2 = 87%), with increased eGFR effect over time (Table 1).

Conclusion

Our findings demonstrated potential renal safety advantages of TAF over both non-TAF and TFV-sparing ART for HIV-1 treatment.

Changes of eGFR in TAF vs Non-TFV Over Time
Follow-up at:Number of studiesTAF regimensNon-TFV regimensEffect sizes (95% CI)I^2, %
24 weeks2196118-3.03 (-11.17 to 5.11)78.1
48 weeks7136914402.50 (1.55 to 3.44)6.9
96 weeks25885863.29 (0.66 to 5.92)68.82
144 weeks13152945.30 (3.85 to 6.75)-*

*Heterogeneity unavailable as only one study at 144 weeks

SD for standard deviation.

Funding

  • Commercial Support – Gilead Sciences, Inc.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)