ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO0064

AKI Etiology Impression by Nephrologists: Evolution and Associated Outcomes

Session Information

Category: Acute Kidney Injury

  • 102 AKI: Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Liang, Cathleen G, Yale School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Koval, Emma L, Yale School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Sung, Daeun, Yale School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Wilson, Francis Perry, Yale School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Aklilu, Abinet Mathias, Yale School of Medicine Department of Internal Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Group or Team Name

  • Clinical and Translational Research Accelerator (CTRA).
Background

The etiology of AKI in hospitalized patients often evolves between initial consultation and final evaluation. We investigated differences in characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients by nephrologist-determined AKI etiology.

Methods

We included a cohort of patients from the KAT-AKI trial enrolled at 5 Yale New Haven Health affiliated hospitals (12/2021-2/2024) and who had a nephrology consult within 48h of AKI detection. EHRs were reviewed to capture consultant characteristics and the clinical impression of AKI etiology for the first 3 days and final day of assessment. We examined etiologies of AKI, their evolution, and their association with clinical outcomes (AKI progression, dialysis, mortality within 14d).

Results

Table 1 shows baseline characteristics of n=363 patients included. 73 unique nephrologists were involved. By final assessment, 48% had a change in clinical impression of their AKI etiology. The most common etiologies across follow up were multifactorial, ATN, and unclear (Figure 1a). Figure 1b shows the change in etiology during follow-up, most commonly from multifactorial to ATN or CIN, and from ATN to multifactorial. In patients whose diagnosis remained multifactorial, the average count of presumed etiologies within that group decreased significantly over time (p=0.016). While a change in presumed AKI etiology was not significantly associated with death, dialysis, or AKI progression at 14 days (p>0.05), initial AKI etiology was predictive (p<0.05). Patients with an initial diagnosis of ATN had worse outcomes (aOR [95%CI]): mortality: 2.7 [1.20,5.85], dialysis: 4.2, [1.6,10.2], and AKI progression: 3.7, [1.8,8.0]. Excluding “multifactorial,” “unclear,” and “other” from both diagnostic fields showed high agreement (κ = 0.85, n=99). Excluding “multifactorial” alone from final diagnosis, agreement was moderate (κ = 0.53, n=148).

Conclusion

AKI etiology impressions commonly evolve. While a change in the clinical impression was not associated with clinical outcomes, the initially presumed etiology was predictive of worse outcomes.

Characteristics
-----------------------------------------
Demographics
Age, mean (IQR), years
Female, n (%)

Comorbidities, n (%)
CKD
HTN
DM
CHF
Cirrhosis
Malignancy

Baseline Kidney Function
sCr, median (IQR), mg/dL

At Randomization
mSOFA, median (IQR)
sCr at AKI, median (IQR), mg/dL

Hospital service, n (%)
General medical floor
Specialist medical floor
Surgical floor
ICU/SDU units
Consult Cohort (n=363)
-----------------------------------------

72.5 [62.0, 81.3]
167 (46.0)


198 (54.5)
301 (82.9)
198 (54.5)
193 (53.2)
39 (10.7)
22 (6.1)


1.8 [1.20, 2.40]


3.0 [2.0, 4.0]
2.2 [1.6, 2.9]


203 (55.9)
55 (15.2)
26 (7.2)
79 (21.8)
KAT-AKI Full Cohort (n=4003)
-----------------------------------------

71.9 [60.6, 81.3]
1874 (46.8)


1665 (41.6)
3065 (76.6)
1884 (47.1)
1785 (44.6)
270 (6.7)
230 (5.7)


1.18 [0.90, 1.57]


2.0 [1.0, 3.0]
1.5 [1.2, 2.0]


1996 (49.9)
553 (13.8)
667 (16.7)
786 (19.6)

Funding

  • Other U.S. Government Support

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)