ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO1066

Difficult Retransitions of Care: Qualitative Analysis of Semi-Structured Interviews of Nephrologists Regarding Dialysis and Retransplant After Graft Failure

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2102 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Knapp, Christopher D., Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Hart, Allyson, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Schaffhausen, Cory, Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Johansen, Kirsten L., Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Ku, Elaine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
  • McKinney, Warren T., Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Background

Despite long term receipt of nephrology care, uptake of home dialysis and re-transplantation in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) who face graft failure remains suboptimal. The objective of this study was to examine provider practices and perspectives with respect to promoting home dialysis and re-transplantation in this population.

Methods

We conducted remote interviews with nephrologists recruited from nine transplant centers who care for KTRs with graft failure. We analyzed qualitative data using grounded theory and a constant comparative method to capture emergent themes.

Results

13 nephrologists completed interviews. Five worked exclusively with transplant patients and eight saw both transplant patients and chronic dialysis patients. Four key themes emerged from the analysis. (Figure 1). 1.Providers were confident in their ability to discuss medical aspects of graft failure. This included confidence with respect to identifying risks, benefits, and medical contraindications of each kidney replacement therapy modality. 2.Providers reported heterogenous approaches to how their practices and referral centers organized the care for the graft failure population. 3. Providers had clear preferences, primarily to prioritize re-listing and secondly to place patients on a home dialysis modality. 4. Barriers to care and suggestions for improvement fell into two domains: patient specific factors and systemic factors.

Conclusion

Providers expressed confidence in their care for KTRs with graft failure, and a clear preference for re-transplantation, as well as home dialysis if needed. However, providers and centers had heterogenous mechanisms to facilitate patients accessing re-transplant and home dialysis services, such as different clinical standards for returning patients to general nephrologists when patients face graft failure. Future research could focus on developing dedicated clinical pathways to ensure optimal care for these patients.

Funding

  • NIDDK Support

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)