ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO1132

Discordance Between Cystatin C and Creatinine Provides Insights into Tubular Function and Clinical Outcomes in Sickle Cell Disease

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2301 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Authors

  • Olaniran, Kabir O., The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Toto, Robert D., The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
Background

The degree of discordance in glomerular filtration rate estimation (eGFR) by cystatin C (eGFRcys) compared to creatinine (eGFRcreat) provides insights into both tubular secretion and adverse clinical outcomes in the general population. Whether these associations are valid in sickle cell disease (SCD) is unknown. SCD pathophysiology markedly increases proximal tubular secretion of creatinine and promotes chronic inflammation (which can elevate cystatin C [CysC] levels). We investigated the differences between eGFRcys and eGFRcreat in SCD compared to non-SCD and the association between eGFR discordance and common SCD outcomes.

Methods

We performed a 2-center cross-sectional study of 1060 adult Black race patients over 5 years (2020-2025) across chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1-5, excluding dialysis. SCD was confirmed by hemoglobin electrophoresis. Outcomes of interest were eGFR difference (eGFRdiff [eGFRcys - eGFRcreat]) and eGFR ratio (eGFRratio [eGFRcys/eGFRcreat]). Outcomes were examined in SCD vs non-SCD (linear regression), across CKD stages (trend tests), and in common SCD outcomes (logistic regression): left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH), pulmonary hypertension (pHTN), heart failure (HF) and stroke. Demographics, vital signs, comorbidities and medications were included in multivariable analyses.

Results

We identified 184 SCD and 876 non-SCD patients. The mean age was 58±17 years, 55% were female, the mean eGFRcys was 50±31 mL/min, and the mean eGFRcreat was 60±33 mL/min. The mean eGFRdiff was -9±17 and the mean eGFRratio was 0.85±0.27. Before and after adjusted analyses, eGFRdiff was larger (adjusted β -14.4, p<0.01) and eGFRratio was lower (adjusted β -0.16, p<0.01) in SCD compared to non-SCD. The trend test for CKD stages in SCD was significant for narrowing eGFRdiff (Z=3.2, p<0.01) and decreasing eGFRratio (Z= -2.1, p=0.04) from stages 1-5. Larger than median SCD eGFRdiff was associated with LVH (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.49, p=0.03), pHTN (aOR 2.62, p<0.01), and HF (aOR 4.28, p<0.01) but not stroke (aOR 1.39; p=0.53). Lower than median SCD eGFRratio results were similar.

Conclusion

eGFRdiff and eGFRratio in SCD are more discordant than in non-SCD and associated with adverse cardiac outcomes, but not with stroke. CysC may be of unique clinical utility in interrogating renal tubular function and cardiac events in SCD.

Funding

  • Other NIH Support

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)