Abstract: TH-PO1097
Comparative Association of De Novo Lipid-Lowering Therapy Initiation with Kidney Outcomes in Patients with Nondialysis-Dependent CKD
Session Information
- CKD: Therapies, Innovations, and Insights
November 06, 2025 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)
- 2302 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials
Authors
- Naim, Mohammad Abdullah Al Zubair, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
- Thomas, Fridtjof, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
- Streja, Elani, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Davis, Robert L., The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
- Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, United States
- Sumida, Keiichi, The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
- Kovesdy, Csaba P., The University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Background
The effect of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) on renal outcomes in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is understudied. We conducted a pharmacoepidemiologic study to compare the extent of decline in kidney function and the risk of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) in non-dialysis-dependent incident CKD patients initiating de-novo niacin and fibrate monotherapy vs. statin monotherapy.
Methods
We leveraged data from a nationwide historical cohort of 3,562,882 US Veterans with normal kidney function enrolled between October 2004 and September 2006. Using longitudinal evaluation of eGFR and albuminuria, we defined a non-dialysis-dependent incident CKD cohort (n= 247,270) at risk of de-novo LLT exposure. We then identified new users of statins (n=46,526), fibrates (n=2,417), and niacin (n=1,524) and followed up these patients through December 31, 2018. We compared the slopes of eGFR in fibrate and niacin users to those of statin users in mixed-effects models adjusted for baseline characteristics. Using Cox proportional hazards models, we then compared the risk of ESKD (defined as initiation of kidney replacement therapy) of fibrate and niacin initiators to that of statin initiators, adjusted for baseline characteristics.
Results
Compared to statins, fibrate use was associated with a significantly lower intraindividual eGFR decline (difference in eGFR slope: 0.35 mL/min/1.73m2/year [95% CI: 0.14, 0.55], p=0.001) and a lower risk of ESKD (hazard ratio: 0.76 [95% CI: 0.59, 0.97], p= 0.026). Niacin use was not associated with significantly different kidney outcomes compared to statin use (difference in eGFR slope: 0.17 mL/min/1.73m2/year [-0.08, 0.41], p=0.19; risk of ESKD (hazard ratio: 1.04 [0.77, 1.39], p= 0.81) (Figure).
Conclusion
In patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD, fibrate therapy (compared to statins) was associated with better kidney outcomes. The comparative benefit of fibrates vs. statins in this population should be tested in clinical trials.
Funding
- Veterans Affairs Support