Abstract: FR-PO0014
Artificial Intelligence-Based Model for Personalized Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent Dosing in Patients on Hemodialysis Who Have Anemia
Session Information
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Health at the Bedside
November 07, 2025 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Artificial Intelligence, Digital Health, and Data Science
- 300 Artificial Intelligence, Digital Health, and Data Science
Authors
- Chae, Seung Yun, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seocho-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
- Lee, Hanbi, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seocho-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
- Eum, Sang Hun, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seocho-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
- Shin, Seok Joon, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seocho-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
- Yoon, Hye Eun, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seocho-gu, Korea (the Republic of)
Background
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are key to managing anemia in hemodialysis patients, but traditional, experience-based dosing often falls short. This study developed AI-based models to optimize ESA dosing using detailed clinical data.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 148,381 monthly hemodialysis sessions from 9,738 patients at 8 university hospitals between 2009 and 2022. Two models were compared for predicting hemoglobin levels and ESA dose: an ML model using 25 variables (3 demographic factors [age, smoking history, height], 15 laboratory variables, and 7 dialysis-related measures) with 3-step time lag, and a DL-GRU+ATTENTION model using 16 variables (2 demographic factors [gender, height], 11 laboratory, and 3 dialysis-related measures) with the same time integration.
Results
For hemoglobin prediction, the XGBoost model achieved an MSE of 0.33, RMSE of 0.58, MAE of 0.36, and R2 of 0.67, while the DL-GRU+ATTENTION model produced similar error values but demonstrated a higher R2 of 0.75, indicating better explanatory power. In predicting ESA doses, machine learning models showed less accuracy, with MSEs ranging from 382 to 431, RMSEs from 10.77 to 20.00, MAEs from 6.36 to 10.62, and low R2 values between 0.003 and 0.09. In contrast, the DL-GRU+ATTENTION model showed markedly improved performance, achieving an MSE of 16.36, RMSE of 4.05, MAE of 1.33, and an R2 of 0.96, reflecting its strong predictive precision.
Conclusion
The DL-GRU+ATTENTION model demonstrated superior performance over conventional ML approaches in predicting both hemoglobin levels and appropriate ESA dosing. This suggests that deep learning-based methods may offer a more reliable framework for implementing precision medicine in anemia management among hemodialysis patients, with the potential to enhance treatment outcomes.