ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO0929

Differences Between Cystatin C- and Creatinine-Based eGFR and the Risk of Postoperative Complications and Mortality

Session Information

Category: Pathology and Lab Medicine

  • 1800 Pathology and Lab Medicine

Authors

  • Pu, Wei-yi, Department of Nephrology, The Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
  • Wang, Yiwei, Department of Anesthesiology, The Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
  • Larson, Nicholas B., Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Lieske, John C., Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
  • Zhou, Leting, Department of Nephrology, The Affiliated Wuxi People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
Background

Cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFR_cys) and creatinine-based eGFR (eGFR_cr) often yield discordant results. The difference between them (eGFR_diff = eGFR_cys - eGFR_cr) has been proposed to predict adverse clinical outcomes, but its association with postoperative complications and mortality remains unclear.

Methods

The primary analysis focused on 26,065 individuals from UK Biobank who underwent surgery within one year of enrolment. Participants were classified into lower (< -15 mL min-1 1.73 m-2) and higher eGFR_diff (≥ -15 mL min-1 1.73 m-2) groups. The primary outcomes were 30-day major postoperative complications and 90-day all-cause mortality. Associations were assessed via restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses, multivariable logistic regression models, and subgroup analyses. We also conducted extended analyses with a median follow-up of 13.7 years, involving 241,006 participants.

Results

In the primary analysis, RCS modelling revealed a nonlinear association, with a threshold near −15 mL min-1 1.73 m-2(Figure 1). Compared with the higher group, lower eGFR_diff was associated with increased risks of complications (OR=1.69, 95% CI: 1.38–2.08, P<0.001) and mortality (OR=2.29, 95% CI:1.59–3.32, P<0.001) in the unadjusted models. These associations remained significant after full adjustment (complications: OR=1.53, 95% CI:1.17–1.99, P=0.001; mortality: OR=1.80, 95% CI: 1.10–2.95, P=0.018) and were consistent in extended analyses (complications: OR=1.30, 95% CI:1.19–1.34, P<0.001; mortality: OR=1.42, 95% CI:1.30–1.56, P<0.001)(Table 1). A significant interaction was observed only in BMI-stratified subgroups (P=0.008).

Conclusion

Lower eGFR_diff was independently associated with increased risks of postoperative complications and mortality, even during long-term follow-up.

Table 1. Association between eGFR_diff and postoperative complications and mortality within one year of recruitment
 eGFR_diff groupNumber of casesOR (95%CI), P value
30-day complicationsHigher (reference)166 (2.0%)Unadjusted: 1.69 (1.38–2.08), P <0.001
Model 1: 1.68 (1.37–2.06), P <0.001
Model 2: 1.59 (1.22–2.06), P <0.001
Model 3: 1.53 (1.17–1.99), P= 0.001
Lower218 (1.2%)
90-day mortalityHigher (reference)58 (0.7%)Unadjusted: 2.29 (1.59–3.32), P <0.001
Model 1: 2.09 (1.44–3.03), P <0.001
Model 2: 2.18 (1.36–3.49), P =0.001
Model 3: 1.80 (1.10–2.95), P = 0.018
Lower56 (0.3%)

Figure 1

Funding

  • NIDDK Support

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)