ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO1150

Efficacy and Safety of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in CKD: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2302 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Cheng, Hong, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Shi, Yunqi, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Ye, Nan, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
  • Wang, Guo-qin, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
Background

Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are considered as a potential effective treatment to reduce proteinuria and protect renal function for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), however limited by causing fluid retention. We conducted this meta-analysis to quantify the efficacy and safety of ERAs in CKD.

Methods

We searched Cochrane Library, Ovid Medline and Ovid Embase for randomized controlled trails to 11 January 2025. Continuous and dichotomous data were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs respectively.

Results

Fourteen trials enrolling 6412 patients were included. Compared to control groups, ERAs reduced the UPCR [SMD=-0.564, 95%CI (-0.777, -0.351)] and UACR [SMD=-0.639, 95%CI (-0.745, -0.534)], achieved more frequent complete proteinuria remission [RR=2.612, 95%CI (1.840, 3.710)] and partial proteinuria remission [RR=1.509, 95%CI (1.316, 1.731)], slowed the decline of eGFR in the subgroup with a follow-up duration of ≥1 year [SMD=0.182, 95%CI (0.044, 0.320)], improved the chronic eGFR slope [SMD=0.154, 95%CI (0.013, 0.295)], reduced the risk of ESRD [RR=0.764, 95%CI (0.606, 0.964)] and decreased systolic blood pressure [SMD=-0.531, 95%CI (-0.763, -0.299)] and diastolic blood pressure [SMD=-0.779, 95%CI (-1.177, -0.381)]. ERAs did not significantly increase the incidence of edema, fluid retention and heart failure, except hypotension [RR=1.917, 95%CI (1.361, 2.702)].

Conclusion

ERAs reduced proteinuria, slow the decline of eGFR with long-term use, prevent ESRD and lower blood pressure in CKD, without significant increasing risk of fluid retention, especially combined with SGLT2i. However, risk of hypotension might increase for patients with low baseline blood pressure.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)