ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO0976

Kidney Transplant Outcomes in Elderly Recipients: Age Alone Should Not Be a Barrier

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2102 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Kumar, Varsha, Corewell Health, Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
  • Lu, Zoe, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Kumaresan, Krishni, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Prashar, Rohini, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Patel, Anita K., Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States
Background

Elderly(E) patients undergo fewer renal transplants due to concerns of increased mortality(M). We compared outcomes and risk factors for graft loss(GL) and M in our program’s E recipients to evaluate these concerns and inform decision-making.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of recipients from 1/13-6/22. Those aged 65 years(yrs) and older who received primary renal transplants were included. Recipients were grouped into younger(RY; 65-70yrs) and older(RO; 70+yrs). Baseline recipient and donor variables and transplant outcomes compared between groups. Primary outcomes of interest were patient survival(PS) and graft survival(GS). Kaplan-Meier(KM) survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression analysis(MA) performed on all variables with censoring date 11/26/23.

Results

199 recipients included; 116 RY, 83 RO. RY had a significantly higher(p < 0.05) preop serum albumin(SA), shorter EPTS, and higher rates of hypertension, ischemic heart disease(IHD), and vascular disease. More RO had no induction agent(NA) and had a donor with diabetes(DM). Foley duration was longer and hydronephrosis rate higher in RY, while RO had higher rate of urine leak. Other characteristics and posttransplant complications did not differ significantly between groups. RY and RO had similar KM probabilities of 1-10 year GS(p=0.21-0.91) and PS(p=0.23-0.95). Median GS was similar between groups (8.5 vs 6.4 yrs,p=0.08), while PS was longer in RY (8.9 vs 7.2 yrs,p=0.05). On MA, higher 1-year serum creatinine was significantly associated with GL in both groups. Recipient DM, IHD, and DGF was associated with risk of GL and patient M for RY, while higher SA was associated with lower risk for both outcomes for RO. Induction with Simulect(vs.NA) associated with lower risk for patient M for RO(Figure 1).

Conclusion

Despite differences in baseline characteristics, we found comparable GS and PS between RY and RO groups, indicating that older age should not be a barrier to transplantation. Future analysis will include waitlisted and dialysis patients.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)