Abstract: FR-PO0471
Convective Volume, Patient Anthropometric Characteristics, and Risk of All-Cause Mortality in Hemodiafiltration: A Cohort Study
Session Information
- Dialysis: Hemodiafiltration, Ultrafiltration, Profiling, and Interdialytic Symptoms
November 07, 2025 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Dialysis
- 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis
Authors
- Cromm, Krister, Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, HE, Germany
- Vernooij, Robin W.m., Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, UT, Netherlands
- Canaud, Bernard J., Universite de Montpellier, Montpellier, Occitanie, France
- Barth, Claudia Maria, B Braun Avitum AG, Melsungen, HE, Germany
- Hegbrant, Jorgen BA, Lunds Universitet, Lund, Skåne County, Sweden
- Davenport, Andrew, University College London, London, England, United Kingdom
- Woodward, Mark, The George Institute for Global Health UK, Oxford, England, United Kingdom
- Bots, Michiel, Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, UT, Netherlands
- Blankestijn, Peter J., Universitair Medisch Centrum Utrecht, Utrecht, UT, Netherlands
- Strippoli, Giovanni, Universita degli Studi di Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Apulia, Italy
Group or Team Name
- CONVINCE Scientific Committee and Investigators.
Background
Higher ultrafiltration volumes in hemodiafiltration (HDF), a surrogate for convective dose, have been associated with improved survival. Whether this advantage is affected by patients' anthropometric characteristics (body mass index (BMI) or body surface area (BSA)) is unclear.
Methods
We analyzed individual patient data from 5 randomized trials to evaluate the association between convective volume and risk of all-cause mortality stratified by BMI and BSA. Cox proportional hazards models with interaction terms, Kaplan-Meier survival curves and multivariable spline models were used to explore potential nonlinear and joint effects.
Results
Our cohort consisted of 2083 patients treated with HDF. Convective volume, BMI, and BSA were each categorized into tertiles (for volumes: 17.9 L (low), 22.8 L (medium), and 27.7 L (high); for BMI 20.9 kg/m2 (low), 25.2 kg/m2 (medium), and 31.7 kg/m2 (high); for BSA 1.57 m2 (low), 1.79 m2 (medium), and 2.03 m2 (high)). Higher convective volume was significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.62, 95% CI: 0.49–0.78 for highest vs lowest tertile). In joint analyses, patients with medium or high BMI or BSA receiving high convective volume had the lowest mortality risks (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36–0.78). In contrast, the interaction between BSA and convection volume was less consistent and did not show a clear gradient (Table).
Conclusion
In patients receiving HDF, high ultrafiltration volumes were associated with significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality, particularly among those with medium to high BMI. This relationship was not consistently observed with BSA. It is plausible that BMI and BSA capture different physiological characteristics. BMI may reflect nutritional status or body composition, while BSA may be a proxy for uremic solute distribution volume. Ultrafiltration volume requirements may align more closely with BMI than BSA, indicating that BMI could be a more practical metric for personalizing convective volume in HDF to optimize patient outcomes.
Funding
- Government Support – Non-U.S.