ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO0572

Comparison of Surrogate Kidney End Points for Clinical Trials in PKD

Session Information

Category: Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys

  • 1201 Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys: Monogenic Kidney Diseases

Authors

  • Noruzi, Anahita, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands
  • Bais, Thomas, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands
  • Xue, Laixi, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands
  • Meijer, Esther, Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands
  • van Gastel, Maatje D.A., Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands
  • Drenth, Joost P.H., Radboud universitair medisch centrum, Nijmegen, GE, Netherlands
  • Spijker, Siebe, Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, ZH, Netherlands
  • Nijenhuis, Tom, Radboud universitair medisch centrum, Nijmegen, GE, Netherlands
  • Peters, Dorien J.M., Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, ZH, Netherlands
  • Hoorn, Ewout J., Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands
  • Salih, Mahdi, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, ZH, Netherlands
  • Gansevoort, Ron T., Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands

Group or Team Name

  • On behalf of the DIPAK Consortium.
Background

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) progresses at highly variable rates. The introduction of new medications necessitates further studies and highlights the importance of identifying meaningful renal outcomes. In nephrology, the classical endpoint for clinical trials has been an eGFR decline ≥57% from baseline, or initiation of kidney replacement therapy (KRT). We studied whether using lesser declines in eGFR or a difference in eGFR slope also captures patients with rapid disease progression and improves power to detect meaningful differences.

Methods

We analyzed data from the DIPAK cohort, a Dutch prospective multicenter observational study, with an average follow-up of 5.1 years. We studied characteristics of patients who reached eGFR decline thresholds of ≥20%, ≥30% and ≥40% or KRT from baseline, and compared them with those who reached ≥57% or KRT. Multivariable models identified factors associated with each threshold. In patients typically included in trials (age <55 years, eGFR ≥30 ml/min/1.73m2, Mayo class 1C/D/E), we performed sample size simulations, to assess the implications of different thresholds for clinical trial design.

Results

Among 590 patients (mean age 48 ± 12 years, eGFR 64 ± 29 mL/min/1.73m2), 333, 242, 178 and 117 reached a ≥20%, ≥30%, ≥40%, and ≥57% or initiated KRT, respectively. Higher thresholds (≥40% and ≥57%) captured patients with more advanced disease, as reflected by lower baseline eGFR and larger total kidney volumes. Mean annual eGFR declines were -4.2, -4.5, -4.7, and -5.1 mL/min/1.73m2, respectively. Independent predictors of eGFR decline included lower baseline eGFR, higher blood pressure, male sex, and PKD1 truncating variants. Sample size simulations indicated that using lower eGFR decline thresholds necessitates fewer patients to be included, yet still require more patients than slope-based endpoints.

Conclusion

Using ≥20-30% eGFR decline identifies patients with rapid disease progression, at earlier stages of the disease. Using eGFR thresholds requires larger numbers of trial-eligible patients, supporting the use of eGFR slope as a more efficient trial endpoint.

Funding

  • Government Support – Non-U.S.

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)