Abstract: SA-PO1218
Dynamic Changes in Renal Hyperfiltration and Influences on Cardiovascular Events, Kidney Disease Progression, and Mortality: A Nationwide Prospective Cohort Study
Session Information
- CKD: Biomarkers and Emerging Tools for Diagnosis and Monitoring
November 08, 2025 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)
- 2302 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials
Authors
- Lee, Jeong-Yeun, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Yoon, Soo-Young, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Kim, Jin Sug, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Jeong, Kyunghwan, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Hwang, Hyeon Seok, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
Background
Renal hyperfiltration (RHF) is a precursor to serious adverse clinical outcomes, including cardiovascular (CV) events, all-cause mortality, and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). However, whether changes in RHF status affect patient outcomes remains unclear.
Methods
We analyzed 4,781,876 individuals with an estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 60mL/min/1.73m2 from the National Health Insurance Service database of Korea between 2012 and 2020. RHF was defined as an eGFR more than the 95th percentile after multiple adjustments. Study participants were classified into four groups based on changes in RHF status: RHF-free, RHF-developed, RHF-disappeared, and RHF-persistent.
Results
Among individuals without RHF, 10.6% developed new-onset RHF, while a considerable proportion (88.7%) of those who initially had hyperfiltration showed resolution of this condition. Compared to the RHF-free group, the RHF-persistent group had the highest risk of CV events (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.28) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.54-2.05). The risk of ESKD progression was highest in the RHF-disappeared group (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.05-1.83). Both the RHF-developed and RHF-disappeared groups were associated with an increased risk of CV events (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.08, and HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08, respectively) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.23-1.37, and HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.16-1.29, respectively), although their risk levels were lower than those of the RHF-persistent group. The risk of ESKD progression was not significant in the RHF-free, RHF-developed, and RHF-persistent groups.
Conclusion
Renal hyperfiltration is a dynamic condition, and changes in its status significantly influence clinical outcomes. Persistent RHF was associated with an increased risk of CV events and all-cause mortality, whereas RHF disappearance was linked to an increased risk of progression to ESKD.