ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-OR017

Development and Validation of a Mortality Prediction Model for Conservative Management (CM) vs. Dialysis in Advanced CKD: Analysis of Two National Cohorts

Session Information

Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)

  • 2301 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Authors

  • Rhee, Connie, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Nguyen, Danh V., University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • Narasaki, Yoko, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • You, Seungsook, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
  • Crowley, Susan T., Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
  • Kovesdy, Csaba P., The University of Tennessee Health Science Center Department of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
  • Mukamel, Dana B., University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
  • Zisman-Ilani, Yaara, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar, The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California, United States
Background

We developed and externally validated a prediction model for survival with CM vs. dialysis transition in two national advanced CKD cohorts.

Methods

We developed a mortality risk prediction tool in 61,118 Veterans with advanced CKD (≥2 eGFRs <25 separated by ≥90 days) treated with CM vs. dialysis (non-receipt vs. receipt of dialysis within 2-yrs of 1st eGFR <25 [index eGFR]) over 2010-19. We externally validated this tool in 76,687 advanced CKD patients treated with CM vs. dialysis from the OptumLabs® Data Warehouse, which contains de-identified administrative claims, including medical/pharmacy claims and enrollment records for commercial/Medicare Advantage enrollees, and EHR data. Prediction models for 1-yr mortality were developed on the basis of survival data up to 2-yrs after the index eGFR using Cox models.

Results

In the VA cohort (43,197 vs. 17,921 receiving CM vs. dialysis), characteristics associated with death included older age; higher index eGFR, UACR, and VA frailty index; faster eGFR decline; lower albumin and BMI; prior 1-yr hospitalization; heart disease; sepsis; and dialysis transition. Discrimination in the development and internal validation VA cohort yielded C-statistics of 0.70 (95%CI 0.70-0.71) and 0.69 (0.68-0.70). In the OptumLabs® external validation cohort, the risk score exhibited a C-statistic of 0.69 (0.69-0.70). Risk score/calibration plots for internal vs. external validation cohorts are shown in Fig 1.

Conclusion

A new tool to predict individualized probability of survival with CM vs. dialysis transition was developed and externally validated with acceptable performance in two national advanced CKD cohorts to inform shared decision-making with clinicians and patients.

Funding

  • NIDDK Support

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)