Abstract: SA-PO1143
Impact of Conservative Management vs. Dialysis Transition on Cognition in a National Cohort of Patients with Advanced CKD
Session Information
- CKD: Progression, Drugs, Modalities, and Environmental Factors
November 08, 2025 | Location: Exhibit Hall, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)
- 2301 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention
Authors
- You, Seungsook, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
- Nguyen, Danh V., University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Zisman-Ilani, Yaara, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
- Kovesdy, Csaba P., The University of Tennessee Health Science Center Department of Medicine, Memphis, Tennessee, United States
- Crowley, Susan T., Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
- Mukamel, Dana B., University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States
- Novoa Vargas, Alejandra, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
- Narasaki, Yoko, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
- Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar, The Lundquist Institute, Torrance, California, United States
- Rhee, Connie, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, United States
Background
Dialysis has been the prevailing treatment paradigm in advanced CKD patients progressing to ESKD, but may lead to impaired physical function and HRQOL in certain subgroups. We compared the impact of conservative management (CM) vs. dialysis on cognitive function in a national advanced CKD cohort.
Methods
We examined advanced CKD patients (≥2 eGFRs <25 separated by ≥90 days) treated with CM vs. dialysis (non-receipt vs. receipt of dialysis within 2-yrs of 1st eGFR <25) over 1/1/07-6/30/20 from the OptumLabs® Data Warehouse, which contains de-identified administrative claims, including medical/pharmacy claims and enrollment records for commercial/Medicare Advantage enrollees, and EHR data. We compared risk of incident dementia, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and combined dementia/MCI ascertained by diagnostic codes in CM vs. dialysis patients matched by propensity score (PS) to address confounding by indication in unadjusted and doubly-adjusted Cox models. We also examined Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models and cumulative incidence curves to account for death as a competing risk.
Results
In 18,383 CM patients PS-matched to 18,383 dialysis patients, unadjusted Cox models showed dialysis transition was associated with higher risk of dementia, MCI, or combined dementia/MCI vs. CM: HRs (95%CIs) 1.40 (1.32-1.48), 1.64 (1.46, 1.85), and 1.42 (1.34, 1.49). Findings were robust in analyses doubly-adjusted for PS covariates (Fig 1A). Fine-Gray competing risk analyses showed dialysis was linked with higher risk of idementia, MCI, or combined dementia/MCI (ref: CM): SHRs (95%CIs) 1.32 (1.24, 1.39), 1.51 (1.34, 1.70), and 1.34 (1.27, 1.41). Cumulative incidence curves showed higher incident dementia risk with dialysis transition vs. CM (Fig 1B).
Conclusion
In a national advanced CKD cohort, dialysis transition was associated with a higher dementia/MCI risk vs. CM. Further research is needed to identify strategies that mitigate cognitive decline in advanced CKD patients transitioning to dialysis.
Funding
- NIDDK Support