ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO886

The Association Between Location of Eplet Mismatches, De Novo Donor Specific Antibodies, and Acute Rejection in Simultaneous Pancreas-Kidney Transplant Recipients Using Novel Machine Learning Methods

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1802 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Sharma, Ankit, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  • Coorey, Craig, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  • Taverniti, Anne Therese, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  • Nankivell, Brian John, Westmead Hospital, WESTMEAD, New South Wales, Australia
  • Chapman, Jeremy R., Westmead Hospital, WESTMEAD, New South Wales, Australia
  • Craig, Jonathan C., Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
  • Lim, Wai Hon, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia
  • Yang, Jean, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  • Wong, Germaine, Centre for Kidney Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Background

To determine the association between HLA class and location of eplet mismatches with de novo donor specific antibodies (dnDSA) and acute rejection in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplant recipients.

Methods

The cohort consisted of SPK recipients (n=170) transplanted in New South Wales, Australia between 2005 and 2017. Using machine learning models (random forest), we determined the association between the number and location of class specific eplet mismatches, and adverse allograft outcomes (dnDSA formation and acute rejection (acute cellular (ACR) and (antibody-mediated (AMR)). One hundred times 5-fold cross validation was conducted using R.

Results

The cohort included 93 (55%) males, with mean age at transplant of 38.7 years (SD 7.0) and median follow up time of 5.0 years (IQR: 2.1, 7.1). The median total number of class I and II eplet mismatches were 17 (IQR: 13-22) and 34 (IQR: 22-47), respectively. The most important (highest Mean Decrease Accuracy) class I eplet mismatches for predicting dnDSA and any acute rejection corresponded to locations 102HV, 149TAH, 152RE, 163RW, 21H, 44RM, 44RMA and 82LR; and for class II mismatches at 76L. For the prediction of class I and II dnDSA, the median AUC and balanced error rate from the location of class I eplet mismatches were 57.8% (SD: 3.5%) and 47.0% (SD: 1.6%); and for class II were 53.5% (SD: 2.6%) and 50.9% (SD: 2.5%), respectively. The median AUC and balanced error rate for predicting any acute rejection from class I eplet locations were 54.3% (SD: 2.7%) and 50.2% (SD: 2.7%); and for class II were 56.7% (SD: 3.3%) and 43.9% (SD: 2.7%), respectively.

Conclusion

In this cohort of SPK recipients, the location of class I mismatches best classify recipients with dnDSA and any acute rejection.