ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-OR030

Multicentre Randomized Control Trial of Phosphate Control with a Modified as Compared to Standard Renal Diet

Session Information

Category: Bone and Mineral Metabolism

  • 402 Bone and Mineral Metabolism: Clinical

Authors

  • Byrne, Fiona Nora, Cork University Hospital, Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • Eustace, Joe, University College Cork, Cork , Cork, Ireland
  • Gillman, Barbara A., Mater Misericordiae University Hospital , Dublin, Ireland
Background

The standard renal diet fails to distinguish between phytate and non phytate bound phosphorus, despite consensus that the latter is poorly absorbed. A modified renal diet based on the increased use of pulses, nuts and whole grains, the avoidance of P additives and of over-prescription of protein may offer improved or similar [P] levels as the standard renal diet but with a wider food choice.

Methods

We conducted a national, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel arm, open label, randomized controlled trial (1:1 allocation ratio) of 1 month of modified vs. standard diet in 74 prevalent anuric adults on maintenance hemodialysis with a 3 mt mean pre-dialysis serum phosphate ([P]) >1.6mmol/L and a stable phosphate binder and vitamin D prescription. Subjects with a history of severe hyperkalemia, parathyroidectomy or recent acute illness were excluded. Subjects were re-educated on the standard diet or educated on the modified diet by the renal dietitian. Analysis was on a modified intention-to-treat basis of the difference between diets in follow-up [P] minus baseline [P] using an independent sample t test and a 2 sided type 1 error rate of 0.05.

Results

We recruited 74 subjects from 13 university dialysis units. Two patients did not have a follow-up [P], due to an insufficient sample and transplantation and thus could not contribute to the primary analysis. The study population was 96% Caucasian, 69% male, 36% of subjects had diabetes. Both diets were similarly well tolerated. The modified diet resulted in a significantly higher phytate and fiber intake (both p<0.01). Baseline and follow-up [P] in modified diet arm was 2.1 (0.5) and 2.0 (0.7) mmol/L, and in the Standard Diet arm were 2.0 (0.6) and 1.9 (0.6) mmol/l; the mean (95% CI) change in [PO4] in modified vs. standard arm was 0.01 (-0.24,0.21), p=0.91. The mean (sd) difference in follow-up [K] -baseline [K] in the modified and standard arms was 0.01 (0.7) and 0.09 (0.6) mmol/L respectively; the mean (95% CI) change in [K+] modified v standard was -0.07(-0.23,0.38), p = 0.63. C terminal FGF23 (n=27) was not significantly different. Limitations of this study include its modest sample size and limited intervention period.

Conclusion

The modified renal diet was well tolerated and was associated with similar [P] control but with a wider food choice and greater fiber intake than the standard diet.