ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-OR128

Outcomes for Kidney Transplant Recipients with Hearing, Visual, Physical, and Walking Disabilities

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 1802 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Thomas, Alvin G., UNC Chapel HIll, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States
  • Ruck, Jessica M., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Haugen, Christine E., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Shaffer, Ashton A., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Ying, Hao, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Garonzik wang, Jacqueline, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Norman, Silas, University of Michigan Health Systems, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Segev, Dorry L., Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • McAdams-DeMarco, Mara, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Background

Lower functional status is associated with higher mortality risk in kidney transplant (KT) recipients. Physical disabilities might also affect post-KT outcomes through similar pathways, but this population has not been well characterized.

Methods

Using a prospective 2-center cohort of 500 KT recipients 6/2013-12/2017, we compared normally able recipients to recipients with self-reported hearing, visual, physical, or walking disabilities. We used hybrid registry-augmented Cox regression to assess the association between disability status and post-KT outcomes (death-censored graft failure and mortality) by adjusting for recipient, donor, and transplant characteristics in the national population (SRTR N=76,112).

Results

Among the 500 KT recipients in our cohort, 24.2% reported a disability: 9.6% had a hearing disability, 16.2% had visual disability, 8.9% had a physical disability, and 11.7% had a walking disability. Compared to recipients that did not report a disability, recipients who reported a disability were more often Black (51.2% vs. 33.8%, p<0.001), spent longer on dialysis (median 2.7 vs. 1.9 years), less often college educated (62.1% vs. 74.6%, p<0.01), less often employed (31.9% vs. 49.7%, p<0.001), and more often on public insurance (67.8% vs. 53%, p<0.01). After adjustment, visual disability was associated with a 3.98-fold higher risk of graft failure and walking disability was associated with a 4.12-fold higher risk of mortality. Other self-reported disabilities were not associated with transplant outcomes (all p>0.05, Table 1).

Conclusion

In this two-center cohort, 24% of KT recipients reported a disability. Compared to recipients without a reported disability, recipients with a visual disability were at higher risk of graft failure and recipients with a walking disability were at higher risk of mortality. These KT recipients might benefit from additional supportive care and monitoring post-transplant.

Risk of Death-censored Graft Failure and Mortality
 Graft Failure aHR (95% CI)p-valueMortality aHR (95% CI)p-value
Any Disability1.58 (0.51-4.86)0.41.02 (0.39-2.70)>0.9
Visual Disability3.98 (1.38-11.50)0.011.02 (0.37-2.78)>0.9
Hearing Disability3.49 (0.95-12.85)0.060.68 (0.14-3.24)0.6
Physical Disability0.72 (0.09-6.01)0.81.74 (0.55-5.51)0.4
Walking Disability0.55 (0.07-4.32)0.64.12 (1.66-10.24)0.002

Funding

  • NIDDK Support