ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO738

Impact of Insurance Type on Kidney Transplant Wait-List Status and Post-Transplant Outcomes in the United States

Session Information

Category: Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health

  • 800 Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health

Authors

  • Morenz, Anna Marie, University of Washington Department of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Perkins, James D., Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Dick, Andre, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, United States
  • Ng, Yue-Harn, University of Washington Division of Nephrology, Seattle, Washington, United States
Background

Insurance type has been associated with lower access to kidney transplant (KT) and worse KT outcomes. In this study, we assessed if insurance type remains a risk marker for worse KT outcomes post Affordable Care Act and Kidney Allocation System.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network data from 12/14 to 6/21. We used competing risk analyses to study the association of private versus public (Medicare, Medicaid, or government-sponsored) insurance on wait-list status and post-transplant outcomes, controlling for candidate, donor and transplant variables.

Results

Table 1 depicts baseline characteristics and wait-list status by insurance type. KT candidates with public insurance were significicantly more likely to die/become too sick for KT or receive a DDKT, but less likely to receive a living donor KT (LDKT). As shown in Figure 1, after KT, recipients with public insurance had higher mortality but comparable allograft survival.

Conclusion

Publicly insured KT candidates are at higher risk wait-list removal, have lower probability of LDKT, and higher probability of dying post-KT. Factors contributing to these disparities need to be addressed in future studies to achieve equity in KT.

Funding

  • Clinical Revenue Support