ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-PO530

Medical, Radiological, and Surgical Peritoneal Dialysis Catheter Insertion Outcomes at a Single UK Centre

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 702 Dialysis: Home Dialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Authors

  • Banham, Gemma D., University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Tabinor, Matthew, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Mahdi, Amar Monaf, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
  • Baharani, Jyoti B., University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
Background

We sought to determine success rates of peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheters inserted at our centre.

Methods

Audit of PD catheter outcomes from 2019 to 2021 at Birmingham Heartlands Hospital (BHH), University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust (UHB). Surgery was performed at BHH and Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, UHB.

Results

In 182 patients referred for PD catheter placement, 220 procedures were performed (83 (37.7%) medical, 80 (36.4%) radiological, 57 (25.9%) surgical). The initial insertion attempt was successful in 128/182 (70.3%) cases - 56/83 (67.5 %) medical, 44/60 (73.3%) radiological and 28/39 (71.8%) surgical. Catheters were successfully sited in 28/35 (80.0%) patients on further attempts.

After failed medical placement, catheters were sited medically in 1/23 (4.3%), radiologically in 10/23 (43.5%) and surgically in 7/23 (30.4%), with 5/23 (21.7%) commencing haemodialysis (HD) after another failed attempt. After failed radiological placement, catheters were successfully sited in 1/8 (12.5%) radiologically and 6/8 (75.0%) surgically, with 1/8 (12.5%) commencing HD following unsuccessful placement. Surgical placement was successful with a second procedure in 2/4 (50%) of those failing surgical placement. 19 patients opted against a second attempt.

There were no differences in one year catheter survival between catheters inserted medically, radiologically and surgically (log rank test p=0.68). Catheter insertion modality, age, sex, ethnicity, cause of renal disease and index of multiple deprivation were not predictors of catheter failure in cox regression analysis.

Conclusion

Catheters placed medically were comparable to those placed radiologically and surgically and offer an option for PD catheter insertion in day case and acute settings in suitable patients. Without predictors of poor outcome, clinical judgement remains critical in determining patient suitability.