ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO277

Central Venous Catheters in Hemodialysis: A Reasonable Alternative?

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 703 Dialysis: Vascular Access

Authors

  • Buckenmayer, Anna, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
  • Möller, Bianca, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
  • Ostermaier, Claudia, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
  • Hoyer, Joachim, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
  • Haas, Christian Stefan, Philipps-Universitat Marburg, Marburg, Hessen, Germany
Background

Arteriovenous fistulas are the gold standard for access in dialysis patients; central venous catheters (CVC) provide a potential alternative, especially in multimorbid and elderly patients. CVCs are considered to be of elevated risk for complications; however, it remains unclear, if they have relevant impact on clinical outcome. The objective of this study was to provide a quantitative and qualitative analysis of CVC associated complications in hemodialysis patients. Additionally, estimated and actual mortality should be evaluated.

Methods

In a retrospective study at the University Hospital Marburg, Germany, patients receiving hemodialysis via CVC between January 2015 and June 2021 were included. Data on duration of CVC use was collected, as well as reasons for catheter implantation and explantation, CVC related complications and comorbidities (diabetes, hypertension, heart failure, peripheral vascular disease, dementia). Additionally, estimated 6-month mortality at time of dialysis start was calculated by Cohen Modell and compared to actual death rate.

Results

478 CVCs were analyzed in 351 patients. Mean patient age was 66.5±, comparable with the average age of dialysis patients in Germany. Initiation of dialysis was the main reason for CVC implantation and catheters were used 309 days on average. Death was the most common reason for termination of CVC use (31.1%), followed by a change of mode in renal replacement therapy (hemodialysis via fistula, begin of peritoneal dialysis, kidney transplantation) or termination of dialysis (29.6%). No correlation was noted between age, type and frequency of complications (dysfunction, thrombi, infection, death). Overall, CVC infections were rare (0.6 per 1.000 catheter days). Complications were significantly associated with arterial occlusive disease, heart failure and dementia (p<0.05). Of note, actual 6-month mortality was lower than the predicted risk to die within half a year (14.3% vs. 19.6%, p<0.05).

Conclusion

This study shows that (1) CVCs are predominantly implanted for initiation of hemodialysis; (2) serious complications are rare; (3) occurrence of complications is independent of age but associated with certain comorbidities; and (4) CVC patients survive longer than predicted. This data suggests that an individual approach for vascular access in hemodialysis patients is needed.