ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: SA-PO425

Reductions in Dialysate Flow Rates Among a Large Cohort of Hemodialysis (HD) Patients and Impacts on Dialysis Adequacy

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 701 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Ficociello, Linda, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Rogers, Brooks E., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Stennett, Amanda, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Goldberg, Marcy Eber, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Smith, Paul, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Belmonte, Kathleen, Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Hymes, Jeffrey L., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Background

National shortages of dialysate have led to measures to optimize therapy while conserving dialysate in US dialysis clinics. Dialysis adequacy >1.2 is a major indicator of therapy achievement. The current analysis aimed to assess whether lowering of dialysate flow (Qd) to 500 ml/min was accompanied by changes in dialysis adequacy or changes in other HD prescription parameters.

Methods

Included in the analysis were Fresenius Kidney Care HD patients dialyzed 1/21/22-1/22/22 and had their Qd set to 500 ml/min at the discretion of the treating physician by 2/25/22-2/26/22. Approximately 30% of patients were not included because their Qd remained >500 ml/min. Patients were categorized into the following categories based on dialysis adequacy (based on dialysis machine online clearance): <1.2, 1.2-1.4, >1.4. Changes in delivered treatment parameters were counted, including changing treatment time ≥10 minutes, blood flow (Qb) by ≥25 ml/min, or dialyzer size.

Results

Patients (n=92,768) were, on average, aged 64 years with 4.5 years dialysis vintage and 43% were women. On average patients’ Qd was lowered from 687 to 500 ml/min. As shown in Figure, 76% of patients remained in their adequacy category despite reducing Qd to 500 ml/min, while 13% and 11% decreased or increased adequacy category, respectively. For those remaining in the same category, the majority achieve this without changes to dialysis prescriptions (64%) where 20% increased time, Qb, or dialyzer size. Among the patients who lowered adequacy, 91% had treatment parameters stay the same or decrease.

Conclusion

Reductions in Qd to 500 ml/min were not accompanied by decreases in dialysis adequacy in 87% of patients. In the 13% of patients with decreases, no increases in HD prescriptions were observed for 91% of patients. An algorithm outlining steps to adjust HD prescriptions when it is necessary to lower Qd may need to be developed as part of preparedness plans.

Funding

  • Commercial Support –