ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: TH-PO300

Kidney Failure Risk Equation for Vascular Access Planning: A Nationwide Observational Cohort Study From Sweden

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 703 Dialysis: Vascular Access

Authors

  • Hahn Lundström, Ulrika, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Ramspek, Chava L., Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
  • Dekker, Friedo W., Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, Leiden, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
  • Carrero, Juan Jesus, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Hedin, Ulf, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
  • Evans, Marie, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden
Background

The optimal timing of arteriovenous (AV) access creation remains a challenge. Our aim was to study if a Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE) threshold would improve AV access planning.

Methods

From 28,798 patients included in the Swedish Renal Registry-chronic kidney disease 2008-2020 we generated two cohorts; first visit when KFRE was >40% (KFRE40), and first visit when estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)<15 ml/min/1.73m2 (eGFR15). The cohorts were followed until start of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) and death, the proportion of patients starting hemodialysis with a working access and test diagnostics for the two methods were described.

Results

The eGFR decline was faster in KFRE40 compared to the eGFR15 (-2.0 vs -0.95 ml/min/1.73m2 per year). KFRE40 had superior positive predictive value for KRT initiation at 2 years (56% versus 43% for eGFR15). KFRE40 had higher specificity (90% versus 79% for eGFR15), while eGFR15 had higher sensitivity (88% versus 75% for KFRE40). If all patients potentially had undergone successful AV access surgery at KFRE40, 75% of patients would ever start dialysis with an AV access; in two years 13% would die and 31% be alive with an unused access. For AV access surgery at eGFR15, 88% would ever initiate KRT with an AV access; in two years 17% would die, and 40% live with an AV access never used.

Conclusion

Using KFRE >40% as decision threshold would increase the proportion of patients starting with a working AV access at the cost of more patients experiencing unnecessary surgery. The KFRE threshold >40% could complement decision making for vascular access creation.

Development of KFRE in nephrology-referred patients, in the year before Hemodialysis initiation