ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2022 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2022, please visit the archives.

Abstract: FR-PO889

A Framework for Anti-Racist Curriculum Changes in Nephrology Education

Session Information

Category: Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health

  • 800 Diversity and Equity in Kidney Health

Authors

  • Orozco Scott, Paloma Claire, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Catlett, Jerrel Lewis, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Seah, Carina, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Leisman, Staci A., Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
Background

Despite national commitments to anti-racism, a paucity of guidance exists on how to critically appraise pathophysiological and epidemiological findings with an anti-racist lens. Identifying scientific racism and replacing it with evidence-based rationale is fundamental to anti-racist change. Mention of race within nephrology curricula should not act as a proxy for polygenic contributions, social determinants of health, or systemic healthcare barriers. Anti-racist curricular change necessitates that teachers re-inhabit the role of the learner, entering an interactive and collaborative process of questioning, adjusting, and feedback.

Methods

We applied the proposed process to two case-studies: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and HIV-associated nephropathy (HIVAN). Citations from widely used nephrology education sources illustrate improper use of race within nephrology.

Results

Nephrology educators can apply an inquiry-based process, assessing the problem, themselves, devising solutions, and assessing impact, to identify and intervene upon scientific racism within curricula. Applying this process to the case of HIVAN, we suggest that sources referencing “Black” race as a predominant risk factor should instead center discussion on evidence-based factors such as causal polymorphisms and social determinants that disproportionately impact Black patients.

Conclusion

In confronting racial disparities in nephrology, educators must work collaboratively to critically appraise where in their curriculum race is implicitly/explicitly naturalized as a biological variable and the impact their framing of race has on clinical practice.