Abstract: SA-PO0506
Efficacy and Safety of Revascularization in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia, Stratified by Kidney Function
Session Information
- CKD: Clinical - Therapies, CKM Health, Special Populations, and More
October 24, 2026 | Location: Exhibit Hall A, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)
- 2202 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials
Authors
- Lee, Jun Young, Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine, Wonju-si, Gangwon-do, Korea (the Republic of)
- Parvathinathan, Gomathy, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
- Liu, Sai, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
- Etemadi, Ali, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
- Stedman, Margaret R., Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
- Chang, Tara I., Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, United States
Background
The optimal revascularization strategy for patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains unclear. We evaluated whether the efficacy and safety of surgical versus endovascular revascularization differed by kidney function.
Methods
Using data from the BEST-CLI randomized trial, 1,704 patients with CLTI were stratified by baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) into non-CKD (≥90 mL/min/1.73 m2), mild-to-moderate CKD (45–89 mL/min/1.73 m2), and advanced CKD (<45 mL/min/1.73 m2 or dialysis). The primary outcome was major adverse limb events (MALE) or death. Secondary outcomes included all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), serious adverse events (SAEs), hospitalization with acute kidney injury (AKI), and dialysis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to adjust for covariates, and results are presented as differences in restricted mean time lost (RMTL, days).
Results
Surgical revascularization was associated with fewer days lost to MALE or death in non-CKD (-127.8 days; 95% CI, -176.1 to -79.6) and mild-to-moderate CKD (-63.2 days; 95% CI, -104.7 to -21.8), but not in advanced CKD (-16.4 days; 95% CI, -78.8 to 46.0; P for interaction = 0.02) (Figure). The effect of surgical revascularization on all-cause mortality was attenuated with increasing CKD severity (P for interaction = 0.01). MACE, SAEs, AKI, and dialysis increased with CKD severity but did not differ by treatment strategy.
Conclusion
The benefit of surgical revascularization diminishes with worsening kidney function, while overall event burden increases, highlighting the need for individualized, kidney function–guided treatment decisions.
Acknowledgment
This manuscript was prepared using BEST-CLI Research Materials obtained from the NHLBI BioLINCC. The content does not necessarily reflect the views of the BEST-CLI investigators or the NHLBI.
Figure. IPTW-weighted cumulative incidence of MALE or death following revascularization stratified by CKD stage.
Funding
- NIDDK Support