ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO0452

Sparsentan (SPAR) vs. Irbesartan (IRB) in Patients (Pts) with FSGS Without Nephrotic Syndrome (NS) in the Phase 3 DUPLEX Trial

Session Information

Category: Glomerular Diseases

  • 1402 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Therapeutics

Authors

  • Radhakrishnan, Jai, Columbia University Medical Center, Division of Nephrology, New York, New York, United States
  • Hernandez, German T., El Paso Kidney Specialists PA, El Paso, Texas, United States
  • Lin, Julie, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, United States
  • Komers, Radko, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, United States
  • Murphy, Edward, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, United States
  • Lieberman, Kenneth V., Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey, United States
Background

SPAR is a dual endothelin (ETA) angiotensin (AT1) receptor antagonist (DEARA) approved in the US to reduce proteinuria in adult and pediatric (≥8 y) FSGS without NS. As FSGS progression in pts without NS may have greater involvement of maladaptive ETA- and AT1-mediated mechanisms than in pts with NS, we assessed SPAR in pts with FSGS without NS in the DUPLEX trial.

Methods

DUPLEX was a 108-wk, randomized study of SPAR (800 mg/d) vs maximum labeled dose IRB (300 mg/d) in pts with FSGS. This post hoc analysis included pts without NS, defined in DUPLEX as those who did not have concurrent (1) proteinuria >3.5 g/day in adults or >2.0 g/g in pediatric pts, (2) serum albumin <3.0 g/dL, and (3) edema, and did not have NS documented in their medical history. Outcomes included changes in urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) from baseline, achievement of UPCR <0.3 g/g (complete remission of proteinuria [CR]), <0.7 g/g, or <1.5 g/g at any time on treatment, rate of change in eGFR (chronic slope; wk 6-108; total slope, day 1-wk 108), kidney failure (KF; sustained eGFR <15 mL/min/1.73 m2 or initiation of kidney replacement therapy), and safety.

Results

In total, 254 pts (SPAR, 129; IRB, 125) had FSGS without NS. Baseline characteristics were comparable between the SPAR and IRB arms (median UPCR, 2.7 vs 2.8 g/g; median eGFR, 52 vs 50 mL/min/1.73 m2). SPAR led to rapid (within 6 wk) and sustained reductions in UPCR, with a mean change of −48% with SPAR vs −27% with IRB at 108 wk. More pts in the SPAR vs IRB arm achieved CR (20% vs 6%), UPCR <0.7 g/g (43% vs 22%), and <1.5 g/g (79% vs 50%); nominal P<.01 for all thresholds. eGFR declined more slowly with SPAR vs IRB (chronic slope, −3.7 vs −6.2 [difference 2.5] mL/min/1.73 m2/y; total slope, −4.1 vs −6.2 [difference 2.1] mL/min/1.73 m2/y; nominal P<.05 for both). Fewer pts reached KF with SPAR vs IRB (2% vs 8%; nominal P<.05). In pts without NS, SPAR’s safety profile was comparable to IRB, with similar rates of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 92% vs 94%) and of TEAEs leading to discontinuation (14% vs 11%) and death (2% vs <1%).

Conclusion

In pts with FSGS without NS, SPAR was well tolerated and led to clinically meaningful reductions in proteinuria, including ≈3× higher CR rates, lower KF rates, and slower eGFR decline vs IRB, supporting the benefit of SPAR in this population.

Funding

  • Commercial Support – Travere Therapeutics, Inc.