ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO0455

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of IgAN Treatments: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis

Session Information

Category: Glomerular Diseases

  • 1402 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Therapeutics

Authors

  • Mechery, Vinodh, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Contreras, Gabriel, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, United States
  • Kota, Sanjana, University of Miami Health System, Miami, Florida, United States
Background

Treatments for IgA nephropathy (IgAN) have expanded rapidly across novel pathways including APRIL/BAFF, complement factor B, endothelin receptors, and mucosal immunity. Absence of head-to-head trials complicates clinical decision-making. We used Bayesian network meta-analysis to generate pairwise comparative estimates across efficacy and safety outcomes.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for RCTs treating IgAN with >30 participants per arm and ≥12 weeks RAASi optimization. A fixed-effects Bayesian NMA compared percentage reduction in 24-hour UPCR/UPER and annualized eGFR slope (ml/min/1.73m2/yr), reported as pairwise mean differences (95% credible intervals). Serious adverse events (SAEs) and infectious events (IEs) were modelled using a binomial complementary log-log model with per-person follow-up offset, yielding pairwise hazard ratios.

Results

Eleven RCTs (n=3,298) with ten treatments and protocols were included: Sibeprenlimab, Atacicept, Iptacopan, Mycophenolate mofetil, Budesonide, STOP-IgAN, Methylprednisolone, Sparsentan, Atrasentan, and standard of care (SOC). SUCRA analysis ranked Sibeprenlimab highest for proteinuria reduction, and Atacicept (150mg) and Sibeprenlimab (8mg/kg) as co-leaders for eGFR preservation. Atacicept was the only agent with significantly lower SAE versus SOC [HR 0.18 (95% CI: 0.04–0.58)]. No treatment differed significantly from SOC for IEs.

Conclusion

Sibeprenlimab ranked highest for proteinuria reduction and co-ranked with Atacicept for eGFR preservation; Atacicept was the only agent with significantly lower SAE hazard versus all treatments. No treatment differed significantly from SOC for IEs. These findings highlight the need for direct head-to-head RCTs to confirm the comparative efficacy and safety profiles suggested by indirect network estimates.

Acknowledgment

League table pdfs were generated with assitance from Claude (Anthropic, San Francisco, Ca, USA)