ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO1093

Ultraviolet (UV) Flash Device System Is Associated with Lower Incidence of Peritonitis in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 802 Dialysis: Home Dialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Authors

  • Tsuchimoto, Akihiro, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
  • Nakano, Toshiaki, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
  • Tsuneyoshi, Shoji, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
  • Okamura, Kazuhiro, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
  • Hamashoji, Tomoya, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
  • Yamada, Shunsuke, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
  • Tsuruya, Kazuhiko, Nara Kenritsu Ika Daigaku, Kashihara, Nara Prefecture, Japan
  • Ago, Tetsuro, Kyushu Daigaku, Fukuoka, Fukuoka Prefecture, Japan
Background

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) -related peritonitis remains a major cause of technique failure and mortality. The use of the UV flash device system for peritoneal dialysis has been expected to reduce peritonitis; however, the evidence is insufficient. This study aimed to examine whether the UV flash device system Tsunagu reduces peritonitis.

Methods

In this study, 97 patients have used the UV flash device system Tsunagu among 249 patients who underwent PD from 2006 to 2025 in Kyushu University Hospital. After excluding 12 patients who used the other automated connection system, we enrolled 237 patients in this study. The patients were followed until March 2026. We compared the incidence of peritonitis in 97 patients who used the UV flash device system Tsunagu with those in 140 patients who used the manual connection. The incidence of peritonitis was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and negative binomial regression models.

Results

The incidence of peritonitis in patients of the UV flash device system Tsunagu group was 0.132 times/patient-year, while the incidence of peritonitis in patients of the manual connection group was 0.271 times/patient-year. The risk of first incidence of peritonitis was significantly lower in patients of the Tsunagu group compared to those of the manual connection group (P=0.03, log-rank test). Multivariable analysis showed that the use of the Tsunagu group was significantly associated with a lower incidence of peritonitis compared to the manual connection group (incidence rate ratios 0.72, 95% CI 0.58-0.88, P<0.01). Furthermore, the Tsunagu group showed a significantly lower incidence of peritonitis caused by Gram-positive cocci (P=0.01, log-rank test). Multivariable analysis showed that the Tsunagu group significantly reduced the incidence of peritonitis caused by Gram-positive cocci (incidence rate ratios 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84, P<0.01).

Conclusion

The UV flash device system Tsunagu was associated with a lower incidence of PD-related peritonitis in patients, particularly peritonitis caused by Gram-positive cocci.

Funding

  • Private Foundation Support