ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO1234

Effect of GFR Difference on the Overall Survival of Adult Patients Exposed to Anticancer Treatment

Session Information

Category: Onconephrology

  • 1600 Onconephrology

Authors

  • Caires, Renato A., Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Inker, Lesley, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
  • Allam, Krishna C., University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Burdmann, Emmanuel A., Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
  • Costa e Silva, Veronica Torres, Universidade de Sao Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brazil
Background

Relative difference between the eGFR calculated using serum cystatin C (Scys) (eGFRcys) and creatinine (Scr) (eGFRcr) is associated with higher mortality in the overall population. Cancer patients have a higher proportion affecting non-GFR determinants of both Scr and Scys. We aim to evaluate the impact of eGFR difference (eGFRdiff) on overall survival (OS) in patients exposed to anticancer treatment

Methods

This is a prospective cohort of adult patients with solid tumors exposed to anticancer treatment at a Brazilian tertiary cancer center. eGFRcr and eGFRcys were calculated using race-free CKD-EPI equations at treatment initiation (T0) and at treatment completion (TF). Scr and Scys were measured through certified reference materials at the University of Minnesota. eGFRdiff was calculated as (eGFRcys-eGFRcr)/eGFRcr x100%

Results

A cohort of 485 patients was recruited between Oct 2017 and Jan 2019. Patients were 53±15y old, 62% female, and 93% with ECOG score 0/1. The most frequent cancer sites were breast (31%) and gastrointestinal (31%);41% had metastasis at diagnosis. The most frequently prescribed drugs were platinum compounds (cisplatin, carboplatin, oxaliplatin) (53.7%) and paclitaxel (39.8%). Patients received a median of 4 (3-6) cycles over 105 (63-148) days of therapy. T0 was collected at 4 (1-7) days before treatment initiation, and TF was collected 124 (44-204) days after therapy was concluded. The follow-up period was 28 (21-32) months; mortality was 30.5%. In the adjusted Cox regression model, eGFRdiff at T0 was not associated with OS. At TF, eGFRdiff above 10% and 20% were predictors of increased OS, whereas eGFRdiff below -20% was a predictor of reduced OS (Table)

Conclusion

In this cohort of adult patients with solid tumors undergoing anticancer therapy, eGFRdiff after treatment was associated with long-term survival and could be used as a prognostic tool in patients with cancer