ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO1146

Cardiac Risk Stratification for Kidney Transplant Candidacy: A Survey of US Transplant Programs

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2002 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Gupta, Mallika, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, United States
  • Mansuri, Rushda Faruk, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Bhave, Nicole M., University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Bobba, Sindhura, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, United States
  • Cheng, Xingxing S., Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States
  • Gupta, Gaurav, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
  • Khirfan, Diala Tareq, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
  • Kumar, Dhiren, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States
  • Kumar, Vineeta, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States
  • Levea, Swee-Ling, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States
  • Malhotra, Divyanshu, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Sharma, Akhil, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Shroff, Gautam R., Hennepin Healthcare System Inc, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Singh, Neeraj, Rutgers University New Brunswick, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
  • Singh, Priyamvada, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, United States
  • Shrivastava, Pritika, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Michigan, United States
  • Yadav, Anju, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
  • Yerram, Preethi, University of Missouri System, Columbia, Missouri, United States
  • Benjamin, Mina M., Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
  • Lentine, Krista L., Saint Louis University, St. Louis, Missouri, United States
Background

Cardiovascular disease is increasingly prevalent in the aging CKD population and remains a major consideration in kidney transplant (KT) candidacy. We conducted a national survey of U.S. KT programs to evaluate pre-KT cardiac risk stratification practices.

Methods

A multidisciplinary workgroup developed an electronic survey distributed to U.S. adult KT programs via the REDCap platform. Questions were organized by cardiac phenotype to assess clinical decision-making across cardiovascular screening domains, including ischemia testing and pulmonary hypertension.

Results

Responses from 62 unique centers were collected between Nov 2025 to February 2026. Known CAD (98%) and diabetes (95%) were the leading drivers of ischemia testing decisions, followed by dialysis vintage, cardiac symptoms, and older age (Fig. A). Most centers used structured cardiology-based evaluation for high-risk candidates, with myocardial perfusion imaging as the preferred initial non-invasive test and cardiology referral for abnormal findings. Severe aortic stenosis, elevated PASP (>45 mmHg), and reduced LVEF commonly influenced candidacy decisions. Following cardiovascular interventions, most centers reported relisting within 1 yr. Waitlist surveillance practices varied, with most centers repeating echocardiography and CAD screening every 1–2 yrs. Delisting after cardiac testing was reported by 45% of centers, while 27% of centers reported bleeding as a testing complication (Fig. B). Multidisciplinary care and improved medical management were the most commonly proposed strategies for improving post-KT outcomes. outcomes.

Conclusion

The survey identified marked variation in pre-KT cardiac evaluation practices, suggesting persistent uncertainty regarding optimal approaches to cardiac risk assessment and management and a need for implementation research in this population.

Acknowledgment

On behalf of the KPCOP Cardiovascular Workgroup