ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO0867

Dialysate Conservation Among Patients on Hemodialysis Transitioning to Hemodiafiltration with AutoSub Plus

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Zhou, Meijiao, Renal Research Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Chen, Ming, Renal Research Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Van Zandt, Carly R., Renal Research Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Ficociello, Linda, Renal Research Institute, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Anger, Michael S., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
  • Stuard, Stefano, Fresenius Medical Care, Pignano, Italy
  • Chatoth, Dinesh K., Fresenius Medical Care, Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
Background

Hemodiafiltration (HDF), a renal replacement therapy combining convection and diffusion, may allow lower dialysate flow rates that lead to dialysate savings despite the addition of substitution volume. A prior single-clinic study using treatment-level data suggested that HDF with AutoSub plus (HDF AS+) reduced dialysate use. This current study evaluated changes in dialysate consumption after transition from conventional HD to HDF AS+ in a larger cohort with longer follow up.

Methods

Adult in-center Fresenius Kidney Care (FKC) HD patients who transitioned from conventional HD to HDF AS+ as part of routine care for 1- 3 months were included. Eligible patients completed at least 12 HD and 12 HVHDF treatments on 5008X CAREsystem. The index date was defined as the first HDF AS+ treatment. A one-month transition period before the index date was excluded. The HD period was defined as 31-120 days before the index date, and the HDF AS+ period as 0-89 days after the index date. Parameters were averaged within each treatment period.

Results

A total of 128 patients were included. Mean age was 61 years, mean dialysis vintage was 46 months, 32% were female, 18% were Hispanic, and 32% were African American.
Following transition to HDF AS+, prescribed and delivered blood flow rates, treatment time, and ultrafiltration volume remained stable. Online Clearance (OLC) Kt/V showed increases from 1.62 to 1.77. Prescribed dialysate flow rate (Qd) decreased from 657 to 462 mL/min and delivered Qd decreased from 635 to 470 mL/min. Using treatment time, delivered Qd, and substitution volume, estimated dialysate use decreased by 12 L per treatment.

Conclusion

Compared with conventional HD, HDF AS+ was associated with lower dialysate flow rates, reduced dialysate use, and higher dialysis adequacy.

Funding

  • Commercial Support – Fresenius Medical Care