ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO1198

Histopathological Correlates and Diagnostic Utility of Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA in Kidney Allograft Injury

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2002 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Kim, Bioh, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Lee, Hanbi, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Kim, Hyung Duk, The Catholic University of Korea Eunpyeong St Mary's Hospital, Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Yoon, Hye Eun, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
  • Chung, Byung ha, The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St Mary's Hospital, Seocho-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
Background

The aim of this study is to investigate whether clinically meaningful elevations in donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) are associated with specific histopathological findings that cause allograft kidney injury, thereby exploring the clinical contexts in which dd-cfDNA may be most useful.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 178 kidney transplant recipients with clinically suspected allograft rejection who concurrently underwent dd-cfDNA testing and an indicated biopsy. The dd-cfDNA testing was performed immediately before allograft biopsy. We excluded patients who were within one-month post-transplantation or had received a re-transplantation. Allograft biopsy specimens were evaluated according to the Banff classification. We analyzed the association between histological diagnoses, Banff scoring system and dd-cfDNA levels and evaluated the predictive performance of dd-cfDNA for each type of allograft rejection, incorporating donor-specific antibody (DSA) status.

Results

Patients were stratified into high and low groups based on a dd-cfDNA cut-off of 1.0%. The incidences of biopsy-proven rejection (BPR), antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), and severe microvascular inflammation (MVI) were significantly higher in the high dd-cfDNA group (BPR: 23.4% vs. 66.0%, p < 0.001; AMR: 17.2% vs. 54.0%, p < 0.001; TCMR: 7.8% vs. 28.0%, p < 0.001; severe MVI: 22.0% vs. 64.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified C4d and MVI scores as significant factors associated with the high dd-cfDNA group, with the MVI score being the strongest predictor (odds ratio: 1.572). The dd-cfDNA test showed favorable predictive power for BPR (AUC = 0.748), likewise good performance for AMR (AUC = 0.710), TCMR (AUC = 0.786), and severe MVI (AUC = 0.727). In DSA-positive patients, using the 1.0% cut-off yielded a positive predictive value (PPV) of 85.7% for AMR. A retrospective review of four DSA-positive patients with dd-cfDNA > 1.0% but no initial AMR diagnosis revealed that three had findings consistent with AMR or later developed AMR.

Conclusion

The dd-cfDNA test is an excellent predictor of allograft rejection and MVI. Furthermore, its high PPV for diagnosing AMR, especially in DSA-positive patients, highlights its potential as a strong non-invasive diagnostic tool for the diagnosis of ABMR to serve as an alternative to allograft kidney biopsies.