Abstract: SA-PO1075
Effect of Quality Improvement Interventions on Key Dialysis Fluid Metrics
Session Information
- Kidney Replacement Therapy and Care Delivery Innovations
October 24, 2026 | Location: Exhibit Hall A, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Dialysis
- 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis
Authors
- Safi, Adnan, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Mengal, Fida, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Syed, Jahanghir, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Kouyate, Gnama, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Akatibo, Emmanuel, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Nenwani, Hari Vishal, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Delp, Crystal, SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Gruessner, Angelika C., SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Salifu, Moro O., SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
- Saggi, Subodh J., SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University College of Medicine, New York, New York, United States
Background
Fluid imbalance in maintenance hemodialysis is associated with cardiovascular complications and worse clinical outcomes. We evaluated whether a structured quality improvement (QI) intervention could improve key fluid management metrics in chronic hemodialysis patients.
Methods
We performed a prospective pre-post QI study in a single in-center hemodialysis unit over two 15-day periods. A total of 467 hemodialysis sessions were analyzed before and after implementation of a multidisciplinary intervention consisting of patient education, standardized nursing workflow for ultrafiltration (UF) verification, and weekly nephrologist review. Outcomes included the proportion of sessions with interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) greater than 2.5 kg, post-dialysis weight exceeding 1 kg above the prescribed dry weight, and a UF goal that differed from the actual UF removed by more than 1 kg.
Results
After the intervention, sessions with IDWG greater than 2.5 kg decreased from 29.5% to 9.8%. Sessions with post-dialysis weight more than 1 kg from dry weight decreased from 39.5% to 4.2%. A UF mismatch greater than 1 kg decreased from 40.3% to 4.3%. Absolute reductions were 19.7, 35.3, and 36.0 percentage points, respectively.
Conclusion
A low-cost, multidisciplinary QI intervention was associated with marked short-term improvement in fluid-related hemodialysis metrics. Team-based strategies focused on patient education, workflow standardization, and physician oversight may improve volume management and overall dialysis care.