ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO0094

Quantitative MRI Biomarkers of ARPKD

Session Information

Category: Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys

  • 1201 Genetic Diseases of the Kidneys: Cystic (Monogenic)

Authors

  • Smothers, Jacob B., Case Western Reserve University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Kavran, Michael, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • MacAskill, Christina J., Case Western Reserve University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Kretzler, Madison E., Department of Radiology, University Hospitals-Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Howarth, Kate, Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Gange, Victoria, Section of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Serai, Suraj D., Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Hartung, Erum Aftab, Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Flask, Chris, Case Western Reserve University Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
  • Dell, Katherine MacRae, Section of Pediatric Nephrology and Hypertension, Cleveland Clinic Children's, Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Background

Autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD) is a rare genetic disease affecting ≈1/20,000 live births and resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. There are no available therapies, despite encouraging preclinical studies. Clinical trials in ARPKD patients have been limited by the lack of effective methods to identify high risk patients or to assess efficacy. In this multi-center study, we evaluated 3 quantitative MRI methods to assess key features of ARPKD kidney disease: 1) cystic burden (Magnetic Resonance Fingerprinting, MRF-based T1/T2); 2) perfusion (Arterial Spin Labeling, ASL); and 3) stiffness (MR Elastography, MRE).

Methods

We acquired kidney MRF, ASL, and MRE data for 27 ARPKD patients ages 6-40 yrs with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1 (n=6), 2 (n=8), and 3 (n=13) and 6 age-matched healthy controls ages 8-24 yrs recruited from our 2 Children’s Hospitals. CKD stage was determined using the CKID U25 creatinine+cystatin C estimated glomerular filtration rate formula. A region-of-interest analysis was performed to determine mean kidney T1, T2, perfusion, and stiffness. Groupwise statistical comparisons were performed using 2-tailed Mann-Whitney U-tests (significance=p<0.05).

Results

ARPKD patients at all 3 CKD stages showed significantly increased mean kidney T1 and T2 values (milliseconds) vs. controls (p<0.003): stage 1: T1=1960±335, T2=87±10; stage 2: T1=2255±328, T2=97±20; stage 3: T1=2293±249, T2=99±11; controls: T1=1548±62, T2=68±4. Significant increases in mean T1 and/or T2 values were also found between ARPKD patients with CKD stages 1 vs. 2 (T1, p=0.043) and those with stages 1 vs. 3 (T1 and T2, p=0.022). Perfusion (mL/min/100g of tissue) was also significantly reduced (p<0.03) for ARPKD patients vs. controls: stage 1=61±20; stage 2=73±39; stage 3=245±120, controls=102±46. ARPKD patients with CKD stages 3 vs. 2 also had significantly increased kidney stiffness (kPa; 4.0±0.5 vs.3.4±0.7, p=0.022).

Conclusion

These cross-sectional kidney MRI results show that measures of cystic burden, perfusion and/or stiffness can differentiate ARPKD patients with CKD stages 1-3, including those with earlier disease (CKD stage 1 vs. 2) and distinguish ARPKD vs. healthy control kidneys. These findings suggest the potential for these MRI biomarkers to serve as safe, effective methods to stage and monitor ARPKD kidney disease in eventual clinical trials.

Funding

  • NIDDK Support – Siemens Healthineers