ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-OR104

Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA-Based vs. Invasive Monitoring in Kidney Transplantation: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2002 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Brousse, Romain H J, Université Paris Cité, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
  • Lefaucheur, Carmen, Université Paris Cité, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
  • Aubert, Olivier, Necker Hospital Transplantation Department, Paris, France
  • Legendre, Christophe M., Necker Hospital Transplantation Department, Paris, France
  • Anglicheau, Dany, Necker Hospital Transplantation Department, Paris, France
  • Budde, Klemens, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, BE, Germany
  • Halleck, Fabian, Charite - Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, BE, Germany
  • Giral, Magali, Centre de Recherche en Transplantation et Immunologie, Nantes, Pays de la Loire, France
  • Elias, Michelle, Université Paris Cité, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
  • Bestard, Oriol, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, CT, Spain
  • Loupy, Alexandre, Université Paris Cité, Paris Institute for Transplantation and Organ Regeneration, Paris, France
Background

Whether a dd-cfDNA-based monitoring can safely reduce the need for biopsy has not been tested in a multicenter randomized trial.

Methods

We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving kidney transplant recipients at 7 centers in 4 European countries between December 2021 and May 2024. At the time of transplantation, participants were randomly assigned to a non-invasive monitoring with dd-cfDNA, or to an invasive monitoring with allograft biopsy performed for cause or for surveillance of rejection. The primary endpoint was the rate of kidney allograft biopsies performed between months 3 and 12. Secondary safety endpoints included death, graft loss, acute rejection, and graft function at 12 months, along with hospitalization and immunosuppressant adherence.

Results

In all, 332 patients were included : 168 in the dd-cfDNA-based monitoring group, and 164 in the invasive monitoring group. Between months 3 and 12 after transplantation, the dd-cfDNA-based monitoring group underwent 49% fewer biopsies than the invasive monitoring group (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 0.51; P<0.001). Safety outcomes were similar in the two groups: death or graft loss occurred during the trial in 12 of 168 patients (7.1%) in the dd-cfDNA-based monitoring group and 10 of 164 (6.1%) in the invasive monitoring group. Biopsy-proven acute rejection occurred in 12 of 168 (7.1%) and 12 of 164 (7.3%), respectively. Mean eGFR at 12 months was 53.4 20 mL/min in the dd-cfDNA-based monitoring group and 55.9 mL/min in the invasive monitoring group (p = 0.449). Targeted biopsies triggered in high-risk patients frequently revealed subclinical rejection and other allograft injuries.

Conclusion

In kidney transplant recipients, a non-invasive monitoring strategy based on dd-cfDNA halved allograft biopsies during the first year of transplantation without compromising safety.

Cumulative Number of Biopsies in the Intention-to-Treat Population of the Trial.