ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO1096

Moncrief-Popovich vs. Conventional Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Catheter Placement in Planned-Start PD

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 802 Dialysis: Home Dialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Authors

  • De la Torre De la Vega, Ixchel, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Padilla Armas, Jorge Luis, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Cruz Aragon, Fernando, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Tanaka-Gutiérrez, Jarumi Andrea, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Verdugo, Samantha Isabel, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Martinez, Ana Theresa, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Medina, Ramon, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Navarro Blackaller, Guillermo, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
  • Chavez, Jonathan, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
Background

Catheter-related complications are a major cause of technique failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). The Moncrief–Popovich (M-P) technique was developed to reduce infectious complications; however, comparative evidence remains limited.

Methods

Prospective, randomized, single-center study including adults with CKD G5 undergoing planned-start PD at Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Patients were randomized 1:1 to conventional percutaneous catheter placement (n=31) or M-P placement (n=30) and followed for 6 months. Outcomes included infectious and mechanical complications, catheter dysfunction, and transition to hemodialysis (HD).

Results

Sixty-one patients were included. Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between groups. Early exit-site infection was significantly higher in the conventional group versus M-P (26% vs 0%, p=0.005), remaining higher during follow-up (32% vs 6.7%, p=0.012). Rates of peritonitis, tunnel infection, catheter dysfunction, and mechanical complications were similar between groups. Transition to HD was more frequent in the conventional group (25.8% vs 6.4%), although not statistically significant (p=0.081).

Conclusion

The M-P technique was associated with fewer exit-site infections compared with conventional percutaneous placement in planned-start PD and may improve PD access outcomes in resource-limited settings.