Abstract: FR-PO1096
Moncrief-Popovich vs. Conventional Peritoneal Dialysis (PD) Catheter Placement in Planned-Start PD
Session Information
- Home Dialysis: Modalities, Barriers, Utilization, and Clinical Outcomes
October 23, 2026 | Location: Exhibit Hall A, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Dialysis
- 802 Dialysis: Home Dialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis
Authors
- De la Torre De la Vega, Ixchel, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Padilla Armas, Jorge Luis, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Cruz Aragon, Fernando, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Tanaka-Gutiérrez, Jarumi Andrea, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Verdugo, Samantha Isabel, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Martinez, Ana Theresa, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Medina, Ramon, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Navarro Blackaller, Guillermo, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
- Chavez, Jonathan, Hospital Civil de Guadalajara Unidad Hospitalaria Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jal., Mexico
Background
Catheter-related complications are a major cause of technique failure in peritoneal dialysis (PD). The Moncrief–Popovich (M-P) technique was developed to reduce infectious complications; however, comparative evidence remains limited.
Methods
Prospective, randomized, single-center study including adults with CKD G5 undergoing planned-start PD at Hospital Civil de Guadalajara. Patients were randomized 1:1 to conventional percutaneous catheter placement (n=31) or M-P placement (n=30) and followed for 6 months. Outcomes included infectious and mechanical complications, catheter dysfunction, and transition to hemodialysis (HD).
Results
Sixty-one patients were included. Baseline characteristics were generally comparable between groups. Early exit-site infection was significantly higher in the conventional group versus M-P (26% vs 0%, p=0.005), remaining higher during follow-up (32% vs 6.7%, p=0.012). Rates of peritonitis, tunnel infection, catheter dysfunction, and mechanical complications were similar between groups. Transition to HD was more frequent in the conventional group (25.8% vs 6.4%), although not statistically significant (p=0.081).
Conclusion
The M-P technique was associated with fewer exit-site infections compared with conventional percutaneous placement in planned-start PD and may improve PD access outcomes in resource-limited settings.