ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO1067

Real-World Effect of Difelikefalin on Missed Dialysis Treatment Burden in Adult Patients on Hemodialysis

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 801 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Desai, Tejas, CSL, Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
  • Soro, Marco, CSL, Rome, Italy
  • Gil Mir, Maria, Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
  • Arens, Hans-Juergen, Fresenius Medical Care Deutschland GmbH, Bad Homburg, Germany
  • Lasky, Rachel A., Renal Research Institute, New York, New York, United States
Background

Chronic kidney disease–associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is common in hemodialysis patients. Difelikefalin (DFK) is the only FDA approved treatment for moderate-to-severe pruritus in this population. However, various non-approved medications are frequently used for treatment of CKD-aP in clinical practice. Additionally, DFK is sometimes used in ways that differ from the approved label, which is based on evidence from randomized clinical trials. Inappropriately managed CKD-aP can significantly impact patients' daily activities and quality of life and can have further consequences, potentially even missing dialysis sessions. This study evaluated real-world missed dialysis treatment burden and different treatment options of CKD-aP.

Methods

This real-world study of electronic records from adult hemodialysis patients treated at Fresenius Kidney Care clinics who initiated DFK between 9/1/2021 and 2/28/2024, had dialysis vintage ≥3 months, and Worst Itch Numerical Rating Scale (WI-NRS) ≥4 at baseline (3 months prior to first DFK prescription). Patients were grouped in four unmatched groups: randomized clinical trial (RCT)-aligned, non-RCT aligned, and non-DFK controls with or without other non-FDA approved anti-pruritus therapy and followed for up to 12 months. The mean baseline age was ~64 years and diabetes and hypertension were common co-morbidities. Multivariate regression models adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates (age, sex, body mass index, dialysis vintage, diabetes Y/N, chronic heart failure Y/N, and ethnicity) were used for analysis.

Results

During follow-up, missed dialysis treatment rates were lowest in the RCT-aligned DFK group. In unadjusted analyses, rates declined from 16.5 to 12.8 per patient-year in the RCT-aligned group, compared with 21.5 to 19.4 in the non-RCT aligned group, 16.6 to 15.9 in the other antipruritic therapy group, and 22.3 to 19.8 in the non-treated group. In adjusted analyses, missed treatment rates were significantly higher in the non-RCT aligned, other antipruritic therapy, and non-treated groups versus the RCT-aligned group (rate ratios 1.50 [1.43–1.57], 1.22 [1.13–1.31], and 1.48 [1.42–1.55], respectively; all p<0.0001).

Conclusion

RCT-aligned DFK treatment in hemodialysis patients was associated with a lower rate of missed dialysis treatments compared with non-RCT aligned or non-FDA approved therapies.

Funding

  • Commercial Support – This analysis was funded by Vifor Fresenius Medical Care Renal Pharma Ldt.