ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO0854

Specialty and Phenotype Patterns in Biologic- and Calcineurin Inhibitor (CNI)-Based Combination Therapy for Lupus Nephritis

Session Information

Category: Glomerular Diseases

  • 1402 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Therapeutics

Authors

  • May, Sawyer Alexander, Spherix Global Insights, Exton, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Rex, Ryan, Spherix Global Insights, Exton, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Price, Lynn, Spherix Global Insights, Exton, Pennsylvania, United States
Background

Contemporary LN guidance supports add-on biologic or CNI therapy with background MMF or CYC, yet real-world adoption and patient selection across specialties remain inconsistent.

Methods

An analysis was conducted of 1,074 non-dialysis adult LN charts from US nephrologists (522 charts; 89 physicians) and rheumatologists (552 charts; 111 physicians), collected between September and October, 2025. Patients had Class III/IV (+/-V) or Class V LN and an eGFR ≥15.

Results

Biologic/CNI-containing MMF/CYC combinations were used in 50% of rheumatology and 36% of nephrology patients. The specialty gap was driven mainly by biologic-containing regimens: MMF/CYC plus biologic +/- steroids was used in 33% of rheumatology and 21% of nephrology charts. CNI-only combinations were slightly more common in nephrology (13% vs 10%), while concomitant biologic and CNI regimens were uncommon but more frequent in rheumatology (7% vs 2%).

Guideline-endorsed combination use was lowest in Class III LN (24% nephrology; 41% rheumatology) and highest in membranous phenotypes (39%-45% and 49%-55%, respectively). CNI-containing regimen use peaked in Pure Class V disease (24% and 23%).

Median UPCR at LN diagnosis was higher for CNI combinations (2.8g/g) than biologic combinations (2.0g/g). Despite higher UPCR at treatment initiation among voclosporin-treated patients, most-recent UPCR levels were comparable between voclosporin and belimumab patients.

Conclusion

Rheumatologists demonstrated greater adoption of biologic/CNI-containing LN combination regimens than nephrologists, largely reflecting more frequent biologic use. CNIs were not the dominant combination strategy overall, but preferentially used in higher-UPCR and membranous-pattern disease, suggesting real-world selection of biologics as the default add-on and CNIs for proteinuric/membranous phenotypes.

Drug
Median UPCR at LN diagnosis (g/g)Median UPCR at drug initiation (g/g)Median UPCR at most recent visit (g/g)
voclosporin2.7
(n=148)
2.5
(n=156)
0.8
(n=133)
belimumab2.0
(n=346)
1.9
(n=376)
0.8
(n=319)