ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: SA-PO0657

COMBO-IGNITE: Real-World Effectiveness and Early Safety Signals of Combination Therapy for IgAN

Session Information

Category: Glomerular Diseases

  • 1402 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Therapeutics

Authors

  • Vasquez-Rios, George, Renal Medicine Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Rajasekaran, Arun, Renal Medicine Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Hussain, Muzammil, Renal Medicine Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Kumar, Jayant, Renal Medicine Associates, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
  • Larranaga, Jorge A., Central Florida Kidney Specialists, Orlando, Florida, United States
  • Madan, Arvind, Central Florida Kidney Specialists, Orlando, Florida, United States
  • Coca, Steven G., Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States
  • Campbell, Kirk N., University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Sanchez Russo, Luis F., Central Florida Kidney Specialists, Orlando, Florida, United States
Background

Therapeutic advances in IgA nephropathy (IgAN), including dual endothelin-angiotensin receptor antagonists (DEARAs) and targeted-release budesonide (TRB), have improved proteinuria reduction and kidney outcomes. However, real-world evidence evaluating combination therapy remains limited. We assessed early effectiveness and safety signals of combination therapy versus monotherapy in a multicenter IgAN cohort.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with biopsy-proven IgAN and baseline UACR >0.3 g/g. Combination therapy was defined as initiation of DEARA and TRB within 30 days; monotherapy was defined as DEARA alone. The primary endpoint was percent change in UACR at 24 weeks using geometric mean change from baseline. Secondary endpoints included ≥30% and ≥50% UACR reduction, achievement of UACR <0.2 g/g, and change in eGFR.

Results

Nine patients were included (combination n=4; monotherapy n=5). Mean age was 44.3±14.3 years, 55.6% were male, and 44.4% were non-White. Combination-treated patients had more advanced disease at baseline, with lower eGFR (33.8±10.5 vs 77.6±18.9 mL/min/1.73m2) and higher UACR (2.9±1.4 vs 1.0±0.2 g/g). At 24 weeks, the overall cohort demonstrated a reduction in the geometric mean of UACR of 41.3%. Among combination-treated patients, 50% achieved ≥30% UACR reduction and 25% achieved ≥50% reduction. In the monotherapy group, 100% and 80% achieved these thresholds, respectively. Median ΔeGFR at 24 weeks was +13.5 mL/min/1.73m2 (IQR -3 to +14) in the combination group versus 0 (IQR -2 to 0) in the monotherapy group. No major early safety signals were identified. There are several limitations including selection bias and confounded by indication.

Conclusion

In this real-world IgAN cohort, combination therapy of DEARA and TRB was used in patients with more advanced disease yet demonstrated encouraging early kidney function stabilization/improvement and proteinuria reduction. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapeutic strategies in high-risk IgAN populations.