Abstract: SA-PO0503
Controlling Hypertension Through Education and Coaching in Patients with CKD: Results from the CHECK-D Trial
Session Information
- CKD: Clinical - Therapies, CKM Health, Special Populations, and More
October 24, 2026 | Location: Exhibit Hall A, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: CKD (Non-Dialysis)
- 2202 CKD (Non-Dialysis): Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials
Authors
- Bragg-Gresham, Jennifer L., University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Resnicow, Kenneth A., Regents of the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
- Richardson, Caroline, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, United States
- Levine, Diane L., Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, United States
- Saran, Rajiv, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Gillespie, Brenda W., University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Delacroix, Emerson, University of Michigan School of Social Work, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Lin, Ying-Jen, University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
- Fagerlin, Angela, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
- Wright Nunes, Julie A., University of Michigan Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Background
Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects >30 million Americans and increases cardiovascular risk. Blood pressure (BP) control slows CKD progression and reduces cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, yet <40% of patients with CKD achieve BP targets. We evaluated whether motivational interviewing (MI)-based health coaching added to CKD education improved BP outcomes across diverse primary care settings.
Methods
In a large cluster-randomized trial across 11 academic, urban, and suburban primary care clinics, 307 CKD patients with uncontrolled hypertension received clinician-delivered CKD education alone (control arm) or CKD education plus 12 months of MI-based health coaching (intervention arm). Nine clinics were at the University of Michigan and two at Wayne State University (WSU). Intent-to-treat and as-treated analyses used linear mixed models accounting for clinic clustering, location interaction, demographics, comorbidities, medications, and baseline BP.
Results
A total of 189 participants had baseline and 1-year BP measurements. Mean age was younger in intervention clinics (66 vs. 69 years, p=0.02); 62% were women. Mean baseline eGFR was 43±14 mL/min/1.73m2, and over half had diabetes. More than 60% self-identified as White race, while all WSU participants identified as Black race. Both study arms had significant BP reductions at 12 months (SBP: -5.4 mmHg control, -6.2 mmHg intervention; p<0.01), without significant between-group differences (p=0.77). Interaction analyses suggested heterogeneity by race, with less BP improvement among WSU participants (Figure). COVID-19 affected recruitment, intervention delivery, and target sample size attainment.
Conclusion
Structured CKD education and home BP monitoring improved BP over 12 months in patients with CKD receiving primary care, while MI-based health coaching did not provide incremental benefit. Potential racial differences in treatment response warrant further investigation to guide equitable CKD self-management strategies.
Funding
- NIDDK Support