Abstract: TH-PO0732
Adsorptive vs. Standard CKRT in Septic Shock-Associated AKI: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Study
Session Information
- AKI: Critical Care, CKRT, Cardiorenal Syndromes, and Clinical Outcomes
October 22, 2026 | Location: Exhibit Hall A, Convention Center
Abstract Time: 10:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Category: Acute Kidney Injury
- 102 AKI: Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials
Authors
- Kim, Jeeyoung, Chung Ang University Hospital, Dongjak-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Yun, Donghwan, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Kim, Minsang, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Park, Sehoon, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Kim, Yong Chul, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Kim, Dong Ki, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Oh, Kook-Hwan, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Joo, Kwon Wook, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Kim, Yon Su, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
- Han, Seung Seok, Seoul National University Hospital Department of Internal Medicine, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Korea (the Republic of)
Background
Septic shock with concurrent acute kidney injury (AKI) carries high mortality in the ICU. Adsorptive membranes enhance conventional continuous kidney replacement therapy (CKRT) beyond diffusion and convection, but whether this improves survival remains unclear.
Methods
We conducted a prospective study with retrospective controls at Seoul National University Hospital ICUs (December 2023–2025). Patients requiring CKRT with vasopressor support and antibiotics received the Oxiris membrane for 48 hours with 24-hour filter exchanges, then transitioned to a standard membrane. Controls received standard polysulfone membranes. After 1:1 propensity score matching on age, sex, APACHE II score, mechanical ventilation, and eGFR, survival was analyzed using Kaplan–Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression.
Results
After PSM, 49 matched pairs showed well-balanced baseline characteristics including similar age (median 69 years), APACHE II scores (median 34 vs. 32), and universal mechanical ventilation use (100%). Kaplan–Meier analysis showed a tendency of higher survival in the Oxiris group across all time points (28-day: 51.0% vs. 38.8%; 60-day: 46.9% vs. 34.7%; 90-day: 44.8% vs. 32.7%; 240-day: 42.7% vs. 30.1%; log-rank p=0.3). Multivariable Cox regression confirmed a consistent trend toward lower mortality with Oxiris across all model specifications (unadjusted HR 0.775, 95% CI 0.473–1.27; adjusted HR 0.734, 95% CI 0.432–1.245).
Conclusion
In this real-world ICU cohort, adsorptive CKRT was associated with higher survival at all observed time points compared to standard CKRT. Although statistical significance was not reached, likely reflecting the limited sample size, the consistent survival signal supports a potential mortality benefit. Larger multicenter prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Kaplan–Meier survival curves comparing Oxiris (OXI) and standard polysulfone (FMC) membranes after propensity score matching.
Funding
- Commercial Support – Vantive Health LLC