ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO0096

Phasic and Net Sodium and Potassium Excretion After Extended-Release Torsemide Compared with Immediate-Release Torsemide and Furosemide: A Controlled Study in Volunteers

Session Information

Category: Fluid, Electrolytes, and Acid-Base Disorders

  • 1102 Fluid, Electrolyte, and Acid-Base Disorders: Clinical

Authors

  • Wilcox, Christopher Stuart, Georgetown University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States
  • Pitt, Bertram, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
  • Anwar, Md Rafi, Sarfez Pharma Inc., Vienna, Virginia, United States
  • Shah, Salim, Sarfez Pharma Inc., Vienna, Virginia, United States
Background

Loop diuretics cause acute natriuresis, a neutral phase and later sodium retention resulting in fluctuations in fluid and electrolyte excretion. We investigated how 24 mg extended-release torsemide (ERT) modifies this response compared with 20 mg immediate-release torsemide (IRT) or 40 mg furosemide (F).

Methods

Participants were admitted to a CRU for two and half consecutive days on 3 periods separated by 2 weeks. They received a controlled diet. Changes in Na+ and K+ excretion after dosing with the 3 diuretics were compared with those during the corresponding time intervals on the pre-dose control day at 0-4 h (natriuretic phase), 4-8 h (neutral phase), and 8-24 h (retention phase). Plasma and urine samples were used to assess pharmacokinetic parameters of ERT and IRT. Na+ and K+

Results

Eighteen volunteers were randomized, and 13 completed all 3 periods. Compared to IRT, ERT showed lower peak plasma concentration, prolonged time to peak but maintained total systemic exposure, demonstrating bioequivalence. Relative to IRT, ERT produced significantly less early natriuresis (122±15 vs 176±12 mmol/4hr; p=0.002), followed by significantly greater natriuresis during the neutral phase (34± 9 vs 10± 5 mmol/4hr; p=0.02), with a similar retention phase resulting in numerically higher, but not statistically significantly different 24 h natriuresis with ERT (92± 17 vs 69± 16 mmol). Compared to F, ERT produced similar early natriuresis (122± 15 vs 127± 18 mmol/4hr; p=0.82) but significantly lower early kaliuresis (3.6± 2.0 vs 10.7± 1.4 mmol/4 hours; p=0.0004), resulting in numerically lower, but not statistically significantly different, 24 h kaliuresis (11.7± 2.1 vs 12.7± 1.9 mmol; p=0.79). Overall, the 24 h urinary Na+:K+ ratio on the diuretic day was 7.6±1.9 for ERT, 7.0±2.3 for IRT, and 6.6±0.8 for F (p=0.03 vs ERT).

Conclusion

In this first head-to-head study, compared to IRT, ERT attenuates the early peak natriuresis, but prolongs it over 8 h. Compared to F, ERT has similar early natriuresis but reduced kaliuresis, indicating an additional flow-independent kaliuretic effect of F. These changes with ERT dampened diurnal fluctuations in electrolyte excretion and resulted in the highest 24 h post diuretic urinary Na+:K+ ratio, suggesting potentially improved clinical efficacy.

Funding

  • Commercial Support – Sarfez Pharmaceutica Inc.