ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: FR-PO1196

Progressive Subthreshold Donor-Derived Cell-Free DNA Rise as a Marker of Alloimmunogenic Kidney Allograft Injury

Session Information

Category: Transplantation

  • 2002 Transplantation: Clinical

Authors

  • Ahmed, Ahmed Khalafalla Mohamed, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Sanoufa, Mazen, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Miqdad, Mohammed A., University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Dabbas, Walaa, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Naik, Ruchi Harshadrai, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Gallon, Lorenzo G., University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
  • Hajjiri, Zahraa, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Background

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a biomarker of kidney allograft injury, with values ≥1% associated with rejection risk. We evaluated whether progressive subthreshold dd-cfDNA rises (<1%) are associated with alloimmunogenic tissue injury.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 68 kidney transplant recipients with clinically indicated allograft biopsy and at least 3 consecutive dd-cfDNA measurements <1% within 6 months prior to biopsy. Progressive dd-cfDNA rise was defined as ≥2 consecutive increases of ≥10%, ≥20%, or ≥30%. Allo-immunogenic injury included ACR, AMR, borderline rejection, and probable AMR. Diagnostic performance was assessed via ROC analysis, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy.

Results

27 (39.7%) had biopsy-proven rejection. Median time from transplantation to biopsy was 12 months (IQR 9–22.8). For rejection, increasing dd-cfDNA rise thresholds improved specificity and PPV but lowered sensitivity. A 10% rise showed sensitivity of 48.2% (95% CI 28.7–68.1) and specificity of 63.4% (46.9–77.9), whereas a 30% rise increased specificity to 92.7% (80.1–98.5) and PPV to 72.7% (43.7–90.2), with sensitivity decreasing to 29.6% (13.8–50.2). For allo-immunogenic injury, specificity increased from 67.7% (48.6–83.3) at the 10% threshold to 100% (88.8–100) at the 30% threshold, with PPV also reaching 100% (71.5–100).
ROC analysis showed modest but improved discrimination with increasing thresholds. AUC values for biopsy-proven rejection were 0.56 (95% CI 0.44–0.68), 0.63 (0.52–0.74), and 0.61 (0.52–0.71) for 10%, 20%, and 30% thresholds, respectively. For allo-immunogenic injury, AUC increased from 0.58 (0.47–0.70) to 0.65 (0.57–0.72).

Conclusion

Progressive subthreshold dd-cfDNA rise may identify clinically significant allo-immunogenic injury despite low absolute dd-cfDNA values. Higher relative rise thresholds improved specificity and PPV, supporting dd-cfDNA trajectory as a potential adjunct marker for immune-mediated allograft injury.