ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO1271

The ODYSSEE-Kidney Health Trial for Home Kidney Replacement Therapy (KRT)

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 802 Dialysis: Home Dialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis

Authors

  • Chan, Christopher T., University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Nolan, Robert, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Group or Team Name

  • on behalf of the ODYSSEE-Kidney Health Team
Background

Task force guidelines for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) advocate informed decision-making about home-based KRT. We hypothesized that automated digital counseling + Usual Care (ODYSSEE/UC) vs. UC alone would increase the incidence of home KRT: composite index of home-based peritoneal- or hemo-dialysis, or evaluation for kidney transplant.

Methods

A 2-arm, parallel group, single-blind randomized controlled trial was used with 1:1 allocation ratio to ODYSSEE/UC vs. UC. Median monitoring of incidence of home-KRT was12 months (range = 4-22). Secondary outcomes included days to home-KRT, and self-reported motivational readiness at baseline. Primary outcome was analysed using binary logistic regression. Secondary analyses used binary logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models to evaluate potential interactions between ODYSSEE/UC vs. UC and Readiness in association with home-KRT initiation, and days to first home KRT event. Post-hoc Bayesian multivariable logistic regression analysis assessed the probability of our findings.

Results

CKD patients (n = 158) were 70% male, mean age = 62±16 years, and 2-year, 4-variable kidney failure risk equation = 45±28. 32 patients initiated home KRT and it was not associated with ODYSSEE/UC vs. UC: OR = 1.5, (95%CI, 0.7, 3.2); but it was associated with a Group * Readiness interaction: OR = 16.6, (95%CI, 1.7, 157.2). Patients in ODYSSEE with self-reported Readiness were more likely to initiate home-KRT (Figure 1). Bayesian analyses indicated that ODYSSEE patients with baseline Readiness had higher odds of initiating home KRT: OR = 4.71 (95% Crl, 1.65 – 13.37), posterior probability of OR > 1 = 99.8%. In addition, ODYSSEE patients who were Ready had enhanced probability of initiating home KRT, but this effect was imprecise: OR = 1.73 (95% Crl, 0.73-4.14), posterior probability of OR > 0 = 89%.

Conclusion

Patient motivation is prospectively associated with initiation of home-KRT or transplant evaluation. This raises the challenge of incorporating procedures in digital counseling to enhance motivation to make informed choices about home-KRT.

Acknowledgment

This trial was funded by CIHR.

Funding

  • Government Support - Non-U.S.