ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on Twitter

Kidney Week

Abstract: TH-PO334

Misclassification of Acid-Base Status Using Serum Bicarbonate in Hemodialysis

Session Information

Category: Dialysis

  • 701 Dialysis: Hemodialysis and Frequent Dialysis

Authors

  • Woodell, Tyler, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Rifkin, Dena E., University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Ellison, David H., Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
  • Weiss, Jessica W., Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, United States
Background

Acid-base status is a potentially modifiable determinant of mortality among ESRD patients. Little is known about how acid-base status changes during hemodialysis, when potential imbalance is directly attributable to treatment. How serum bicarbonate performs in ESRD patients at estimating acid-base status compared to the gold standard – pH – is unknown.

Methods

In a cohort of veterans with ESRD, we prospectively assessed acid-base status monthly at the beginning and end of routine hemodialysis for three months by measuring bicarbonate (as total CO2) and pH. Bias of measured bicarbonate was evaluated with Bland-Altman plots and concordance correlation coefficients comparing measured bicarbonate to that calculated from the Henderson-Hasselbalch equation using pH and pCO2. Categorizing measured bicarbonate and pH, we determined the proportion of pre-dialysis paired samples for which measured bicarbonate misclassified acid-base status (i.e. measured bicarbonate < 24 mmol/L when pH > 7.40, or vice versa).

Results

Among 25 participants, mean pH was 7.41 (± 0.04) pre-dialysis and 7.48 (± 0.05) post-dialysis; 75% of post-dialysis pH measurements were ≥ 7.45. Compared to calculated bicarbonate, measured bicarbonate produced lower estimates of acid-base status both pre-dialysis (mean difference ranged from -1.52 [95% CIs -1.91 to -1.13] to -1.35 [95% CIs -1.69 to -1.00] mmol/L) and post-dialysis (mean difference ranged from -2.70 [95% CIs -3.41 to -1.99] to -0.80 [95% CIs -1.29 to -0.31] mmol/L). There was considerable month-to-month variability in concordance both pre-dialysis (ranging from 0.61 [95% CIs 0.42 to 0.79] to 0.85 [95% CIs 0.76-0.95]) and post-dialysis (0.44 [95% CIs 0.25-0.64] to 0.87 [95% CIs 0.77-0.97]). Compared to pH, 21 of 71 (30%) pre-dialysis bicarbonate samples misclassified acid-base status.

Conclusion

The majority of patients became alkalemic during hemodialysis despite arriving with normal acid base status – a finding currently under recognized in clinical practice. Measured bicarbonate suggested a more acidemic state than was measured by pH. Serum bicarbonate measurements misclassified acid base status in 30% of cases. If confirmed, this observation could impact how physicians prescribe dialysate bicarbonate.

Funding

  • Other NIH Support