ASN's Mission

ASN leads the fight to prevent, treat, and cure kidney diseases throughout the world by educating health professionals and scientists, advancing research and innovation, communicating new knowledge, and advocating for the highest quality care for patients.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on Twitter

Kidney Week

Abstract: PO1682

The Difference in eGFR by Cystatin C vs. Creatinine Is Strongly Associated with Mortality Independent of Measured GFR

Session Information

Category: Geriatric Nephrology

  • 1100 Geriatric Nephrology

Authors

  • Potok, O. Alison, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Rifkin, Dena E., University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Ix, Joachim H., University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States
  • Shlipak, Michael, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California, United States
  • Schneider, Alice, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Mielke, Nina, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Schaeffner, Elke, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • Ebert, Natalie, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Berlin, Germany
Background

In preliminary work, we have shown that the difference in glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) estimated by cystatin C [eGFRCys] and creatinine [eGFRCr], was associated with risk of frailty, hospitalization, cardiovascular events and mortality. Prior studies lacked directly measured GFR so it remained uncertain if associations were influenced by kidney function.

Methods

567 participants of the Berlin Initiative Study (BIS) had baseline GFR measured by iohexol clearance (mGFR), as well as serum creatinine and cystatin C levels. eGFRCr and eGFRCys were calculated using CKD-EPI equations, and eGFRDiff was defined as eGFRCys - eGFRCr. Mortality was recorded during up to 8 years follow-up. The association between eGFRDiff and mortality was assessed using Cox regression.

Results

Average (SD) age was 79 (±6) years, eGFRCys 63 (±21), and eGFRCr 69 (±17) for an eGFRDiff of -6 (±12) mL/min/1.73m2. Compared to participants with minimal differences in eGFR, those with a substantially positive difference eGFRDiff (≥10 mL/min/1.73m2) were younger (76 vs. 78 years), less were diabetic (17% vs. 24%) and fewer took antihypertensives (59% vs 76%). Those with a substantially negative eGFRDiff (≤ -10 mL/min/1.73m2) were at much higher death risk which was minimally influenced with or without adjustment for measured GFR, age, sex, and urine albumin/creatinine ratio (Table).

Conclusion

In BIS, an eGFRCys estimate that was substantially less than an eGFRCr estimate was associated with significantly higher risk of death. This association remained after adjusting for mGFR. Important clinical information beyond kidney function is embedded in eGFRDiff.

Table. Association of eGFRDiff with Mortality in Older Adults in the Berlin Initiative Study
All cause mortalityeGFRDiff= eGFRCys-eGFRCreGFRDiffGroups
  Negative ( eGFRCys-eGFRCr ≤ -10)Reference (-10< eGFRCys-eGFRCr ≤+10)Positive ( eGFRCys-eGFRCr > + 10)
 n=567 # events=154n = 200 # events =74n = 308 # events=73n = 59 # events=7
Age mean (SD), years79 (6)79 (6)78 (6)76 (5)
Female N (%)243 (43)76 (38)140 (45)27 (46)
mGFR mean (SD) mL/min/1.73m260 (16)57 (14)60 (17)72 (14)
 Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Per 1SD=12 point increment
Hazard Ratio (95% CI)Hazard Ratio (95% CI)Hazard Ratio (95% CI)
Unadjusted0.64 (0.55; 0.76)1.73 (1.25; 2.39)1 (ref)0.51 (0.23; 1.10)
adjusted for mGFR0.68 (0.57; 0.82)1.75 (1.26; 2.42)1 (ref)0.94 (0.42; 2.07)
adjusted for age, sex, mGFR and urine alb/creat ratio0.71 (0.60; 0.85)1.71 (1.23; 2.37)1 (ref)1.01 (0.46; 2.25)

Funding

  • Private Foundation Support