ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2021 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2021, please visit the archives.

Abstract: PO0174

Risk for AKI in the Outpatient Setting

Session Information

Category: Acute Kidney Injury

  • 101 AKI: Epidemiology, Risk Factors, and Prevention

Authors

  • Murphy, Daniel P., University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Reule, Scott, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Vock, David Michael, University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
  • Drawz, Paul E., University of Minnesota Medical School Twin Cities, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Background

Risk-factors for acute kidney injury (AKI) in the hospital have been well studied. Yet, tools for identifying outpatients at high risk for AKI are not available.

Methods

A development cohort for modelling risk of AKI without concurrent or subsequent hospitalization was defined by repeated primary care encounters in an urban healthcare system. An external validation cohort was similarly defined in the Veterans Health Administration. Logistic regression with bootstrap sampling for backward stepwise covariate elimination was used to develop a model for outpatient AKI in an 18-month outcome period. The model was then transformed into two binary tests to identify high-risk patients: one for research and another for clinical care.

Results

Outpatient AKI occurred in 4611 of 152,371 (3.0%) and 115,744 of 4,864,576 (2.4%) patients in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The model C-statistics were 0.72 (95% CI: 0.71-0.73) and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.72-0.72) in the development and validation cohorts. The research test had sensitivity of 0.21 (95% CI: 0.21-0.21) and specificity of 0.95 (95% CI: 0.95-0.95). The clinical test, with a lower test-positivity threshold, had sensitivity of 0.49 (95% CI: 0.49-0.50) and specificity of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.81-0.81).

Conclusion

The outpatient AKI-risk prediction model performed well in both continuous and binary forms.

Performance in the validation cohort of two binary tests for outpatient AKI in 18 months
StatisticResearch TestClinical Test
Threshold for test-positivity (a)≥9.5% (b)≥4.5% (b)
Sensitivity0.210 (95% CI: 0.208-0.213)0.494 (95% CI: 0.491-0.497)
Specificity0.952 (95% CI: 0.951-0.952)0.806 (95% CI: 0.806-0.807)
Positive predictive value0.096 (95% CI: 0.094-0.097)0.058 (95% CI: 0.058-0.059)
Negative predictive value0.980 (95% CI: 0.980-0.980)0.985 (95% CI: 0.985-0.985)
Percent of cohort "positive" by the test5.2%20.0%

(a) Derived in the development cohort (b) P <0.001 for predicting outpatient AKI in the validation cohort

Observed risk vs. mean predicted risk of outpatient AKI in 18 months by decile of predicted risk in the validation cohort.