ASN's Mission

To create a world without kidney diseases, the ASN Alliance for Kidney Health elevates care by educating and informing, driving breakthroughs and innovation, and advocating for policies that create transformative changes in kidney medicine throughout the world.

learn more

Contact ASN

1401 H St, NW, Ste 900, Washington, DC 20005

email@asn-online.org

202-640-4660

The Latest on X

Kidney Week

Please note that you are viewing an archived section from 2021 and some content may be unavailable. To unlock all content for 2021, please visit the archives.

Abstract: SA-OR33

Antibodies Anti-Rituximab Do Not Affect Response to Rituximab in Idiopathic Nephrotic Syndrome

Session Information

Category: Glomerular Diseases

  • 1203 Glomerular Diseases: Clinical, Outcomes, and Trials

Authors

  • Angeletti, Andrea, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Liguria, Italy
  • Bruschi, Maurizio, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Liguria, Italy
  • Lugani, Francesca, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Liguria, Italy
  • Colucci, Manuela, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Roma, Lazio, Italy
  • Vivarelli, Marina, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Roma, Lazio, Italy
  • Emma, Francesco, Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesu, Roma, Lazio, Italy
  • Caridi, Gianluca, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Liguria, Italy
  • Verrina, Enrico E., Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Liguria, Italy
  • Ghiggeri, Gian Marco, Istituto Giannina Gaslini, Genova, Liguria, Italy
Background

Previous studies reported how infusion of the chimeric anti-CD20 rituximab results in production of antibodies anti-rituximab, that may limit the efficacy of further infusions. Among other reasons, the reduced immunogenicity of fully humanized anti-CD20 antibodies should increase their efficacy. In a randomized clinical trial, we compared the efficacy of ofatumumab vs. rituximab in children and young adults with steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome. As secondary endpoints, we evaluated possible role of anti-CD20 rituximab.

Methods

We randomized 140 children treated with single infusion of rituximab or ofatumumab, with a follow up of 24 months. We measured anti-rituximab antibodies IgG at the enrolment in 64/140 (46%) patients who have previously received rituximab and at 6 months in patients in the rituximab arm. Median time of the previous rituximab was 36 (12-51) months before enrolment.

Results

As primary endpoint, ofatumumab was not superior to rituximab in maintaining remission (Fig 1a). Serum anti-rituximab IgG were undetectable at baseline in 64 participants who had previously received rituximab. Six months following rituximab infusion, anti-rituximab antibody levels increased in 14 (42%) of the 33/64 patients who were randomized in the rituximab arm (Fig 1b). Among patients with relapse in rituximab arm, the efficacy of a second infusion of rituximab, infused in accordance with the protocol, was not affected by the presence of anti-rituximab antibodies (Fig 1c).

Conclusion

Previous exposure to rituximab results in production of anti-rituximab antibodies, which persist for a limited time. Presence of circulating anti-rituximab antibodies does not affect response to rituximab in steroid dependent nephrotic syndrome.